Dr. J.O.J. Okezie V. The Federal Attorney General & Anor (1979) LLJR-SC

Dr. J.O.J. Okezie V. The Federal Attorney General & Anor (1979)

LawGlobal-Hub Lead Judgment Report


The purported statement of claim and the purported claims in this matter are hereby struck out, counsel for the “plaintiff” having conceded that the Supreme Court of Nigeria has no jurisdiction in the matter under the Constitution of the Federation, No.20 of 1963, which is the existing constitution under which the Supreme Court is empowered to exercise jurisdiction, whether original or appellate jurisdiction.  Counsel also withdrew the claim in the circumstances.

This court found it necessary during the argument of counsel to point out that Section 114 of the existing Constitution of the Federation was suspended by Decree No. 1 of 1966, Schedule 1, the Constitution (Suspension and Modification) Decree 1966 and has not been revived. 

The court also found it necessary to point out that Supreme Court Rules, 1977 on which counsel relied, in particular Order 5, cannot confer jurisdiction on, or enlarge the jurisdiction of, the Supreme Court, since the Supreme Court cannot confer jurisdiction on itself and thereby usurp the function of the constitution-making authority or the legislature.

In the result, counsel for the “plaintiff” having withdrawn the purported action and Statement of Claim, they are accordingly struck out, with costs to the “defendants” assessed and fixed at N300.00 to be paid by the “plaintiff”.

Other Citation: (1979) LCN/2145(SC)

Published by

LawGlobal Hub

LawGlobal Hub is your innovative global resource of law and more. Among other things, we ensure easy accessibility to the laws of countries around the world.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *