Tort of Negligence (Elements, Duty of Care, Categories) – Fortune Dikio

Tort of Negligence

Introduction

The Law of Tort imposes a general duty, which everyone owe’s to persons generally. The Law of Tort enable’s Claimants seek redress in courts for damages and from these cases, principles on Tort begins to evolve, under the Common Law System ( judicial precedent).

Often times before the Tort of negligence was introduced, claims for personal injury was mainly restricted to those falling within established writs and only where contractual relationship, that is privity of contract existed. Hence, the Locus Classicus case of Donoghue v Stevenson in 1932, changed this narrative. The case, succeeded in making negligence a separate and distinct tort, and liability arising from where, the Standard Duty of Care was breached by the defendant, causing harm or injury ( not limited to physical injury).

Everyday, people may at one time or another suffer damage from careless or negligent acts of other persons. Therefore, this classical case, removed the barrier or impediment of having to prove , “privity of Contract”, between the victim and tortfeasor, or bringing such a claim under established writs, or suing for negligence as part of the Tort of Trespass to Person.

However, this case opens a floodgate for different torts of negligence, as elucidated by Lord, MC Millan, he averred in this classical case;

“The categories of negligence are never closed”.

It was feared that the scope would be too broad, hence, the establishment of the Neighbourhood Principle or Proximity or reasonable foreseeability test, in limiting unnecessary claims of negligence, or usurping other areas of Tort. Thus, negligence occurred only where,

  • there was a duty of care owed by defendant to the claimant;
  • a breach of such duty owed;
  • Such breach of duty leading to injury to the claimant.

That, is where defendants act is likely to cause harm to another, and he goes on to carry out such act, the defendant would be liable. This lead to Establishment of ” neighborhood Principle” in donoghue v stevenson.

Nevertheless, it is interesting to note that new cases are still on the increase, due to evolution in socialization, industrialization mechanisms in the society in tandem with Mc Millan’s dictum; “the categories of negligence are never closed”.

This work examines the statement of Lord MC Millan, in the light of judicial and juristic authorities. It does this by examining the Concept of Negligence, the Legal Elements of Negligence; the case of Donoghue v Stevenson and its Significance, the Different Categories of duty of care, Evaluation of dictum of Lord MC Millan in light of the meaning of that dictum, Role of the Courts in expanding the Categories of Negligence, Factors that influence new categories of negligence, and others.

The Concept of the Tort of Negligence

In order to examine and discuss the dictum of Lord Mc Millan, it becomes imperative to understand what negligence entails.

The Tort of Negligence was developed to remedy those acts or omissions, not necessarily intentional which may have occurred without any form of fiduciary relationship. The Tort of Negligence is a very Dynamic, pulsating and scintillating area of Law of Tort. It is the commonest tort. The Tort of Negligence evolved from the period of industrial revolution in the 19th century, during which workers suffered consistent harm during the course of their work in the factories.

What then is Negligence?

In Odinika v Moghalu, per Justice Apata ;

“Generally, negligence is an omission or failure to do something which a reasonable and prudent man under similar circumstances would do, or the doing of something which a reasonable and prudent man would not do”

In Rabiu Hamza v Peter Kure, per Mohammed JSC elucidated;

“Negligence is any conduct that falls below the standard established to protect others against unreasonable risk of harm. The term denotes culpable carelessness.”

That is to say, any conduct or omission falling below the legal Standard established to protect others against that which is intentionally or want only or wilfully disregardful of other’s right. One might be tempted to ask, whether it is just any act of carelessness , recklessness, negligent, indifferent, heedless act of another that can constitute an actionable tort in negligence?

In Lochelly Iron and Coal co. Ltd v Mc Mullan, per Lord Wright, he avowed and unraveled the question above;

“In strict legal analysis, negligence means more than heedless or careless conduct, whether an omission, or commission; it properly connotes the complex concepts of duty, the breach, and damages thereby suffered by the person to whom the duty is owing”.

The Elements of Negligence.

In P.W (Nig.) Ltd v Mansel Motors Ltd;

The appellate Court averred ;

“Negligence is a tort and is completed and actionable when three conditions are satisfied, these are;

  • The defendant owed a duty of care to the Claimant;
  • That the duty of care was breached; and
  • The Claimant suffered damages arising from the breach”.

These elements would be briefly examined drawing a leaf from the locus Classicus case of Donoghue v Stevenson*.

Duty of Care in Tort of Negligence.

The law of Tort deals generally with the duty fixed by law, owing to all persons generally. In law of Tort, a duty of care is that legal obligation which is imposed on an individual, requiring adherence to a standard of reasonable care while performing any act that could foreseeably harm others. The law of Tort of negligence following the principles in Donoghue v Stevenson, is hinged on whether or not there was a duty of care*, it is to be established before any other element is to be substantiated. Where there is no duty, there is no liability*

However, where there exists a duty of Care defendant must behave reasonably, cautiously and prudently; where he fails to do so and his act or omission causes harm, he is at his own peril.

What are the categories of Negligence?

Following Mc Millan’s dictum in Donoghue v Stevenson, we have anayzed how relevant and prominent the case was in developing a distinct tort of negligence, hinged on the Standard Duty of Care or the reasonable foreseeability test. By this neighborhood principle, Lord Atkin was able to open a floodgate of different areas or categories from which duty of Care could exist, a breach leading to liability.

However, in other to Control these cases and set a reasonable limit, where a case comes before a court, it is no longer necessary, whether it is an established one or a novel case, but what becomes necessary becomes whether , the defendant owed a duty of Care to the Claimant or if he could reasonably forsee that his act could injure his neighbor*. This becomes a viable test and has since evolved progressively.

Some duty of Care situations includes;

  • Employer- Employee Relationship:

In Wilson and Clyde Coal v English* it was elucidated that an employer nunder the common law has the following duty towards his employees;

a) Dury to employ competent staff who wouldn’t jeopardize the safety of his colleagues*

b) a safe place of work*

c) a safe system of work and effective supervision

d) adequate working tools, plants, equipment and thier maintenance.

In Western Nigerian Trading Co v Ajao, an employee sustained injury when a splinter of metal flew into his eyes. The court held the employers liable, as they must provide for safety materials such as safety Googles, handgloves, in tandem with the peculiarities of the job and enjoy strict compliance.These safety equipment, and materials must not be worn out, as in Obakoro v Forex co. Inc, where employee wore tattered handgloves and sustained injuries while working. Also in walker v Northumberland cc; the court held employers have a duty to appropriate task suitable for workers, and provide assistance when necessary.

  • Duty of Care for Road Users:

All persons using the road owe a duty to one another to act reasonably so as not to cause injury, harm to other road users. As in Eseigbe v Agholor , where a trailer hit the Claimants car from behind, causing serious injuries and burns, they Claimant was held liable. In bourgill v Young, Lord Mc Millan stated that ;

“Proper care connotes avoidance of excessive speed, keeping a good look out, observing traffic rules , signals and so on.”

The same Standard of Care is expected of experienced and learner drivers. According to to Lord Denning,* in Nettleship v Weston;

” This standard is an objective standard, impersonal and universally fixed, in relation to the safety of other users of the highway.

  • Baile- Bailor Relationship:

A bailee who accepts goods from a bailor for safe keeping , carriage, or other purposes, owes a duty of Care to take proper care of the goods entrusted to him, whether such bailment is for a reward or gratuitous *. In Hill Station Hotel Ltd v Adeyi, the court of Appeal held, if goods belonging to a guest are stolen or lost or damaged in a hotel, the proprietor of the hotel as an inn keeper, is prima facie liable, although there exits some exceptions.

  • Carriers: in Nigeria Airways Ltd v Abe, the court of Appeal held that a carrier of passengers whether by road, rail, water or air owe a duty to take reasonable care for the safety of their passengers in the course of such carriage and the liability for the breach of this duty applies to carriers equally.
  • Occupiers Liability: an occupier of premises owe a duty of Care to lawful visitors to ensure the premises is reasonably safe.
  • Contractors, architects owe a duty of care, to ensure building’s, roads, and other projects carried on are reasonably safe. E.g in Wells v Cooper, where there was negligence in fixing the door, this caused injuries.Also, the case of Clayton v Woodman.
  • Manufacturers of products: owe a duty of care to consumers of their products, to ensure that the products manufactured are reasonably free from defects, so as not to injure the consumers. As in Osemebor v Niger Biscuits, Donoghue v Stevenson, Grant v Australian Knitting Mills etc.
  • Distributors, traders and Agents must ensure they purchase and sell only reasonable and mercantible goods or products , suitable for the common purpose for which it is used for. As in Ngonadi v Nigerian Bottling company, where a defective refrigerator exploded causing injuries.
  • Negligent misstatement which causes economic loss as in Hedley Bryne v Heller & Partnersltd.

These instances goes on and on , as stated by Lord Mc Millan in Donoghue v Stevenson; ” categories of Negligence are never closed”.

The Categories of Negligence are Never Closed

What this imply?

The statement above is short, but fundamental. It implies that the different situations in which negligence may occur are endless and carried. As modernization goes on and new products are invented, new relationships are developed, a new duty of care may be recognized by the law and its breach appropriately sanctioned.* In other words, the kinds of negligence are inexhaustible, and the situation within which the duty of care may arise are many and cannot be exhausted, that is it is no possible to enumerate all the situations in which a duty of care is owed to another person.

Man is dynamic, so also is the society swimming in this time of dynamism with modern developments, activities and new relationship, new situations of duty of care would continue to arise. The purview of negligence has gone beyond ‘only established rules’, as new situations arises and are litigated upon by the courts, the judges duty is to grant remedy to the Claimants, in tort of negligence where the court is satisfied that a duty of care exists. – ubi jus Ubi remedium, where there’s a legal wrong, there’s a remedy.

Hence, Donoghue v Stevenson comes very much alive in creating a modern negligence hinged on the duty of care, however, in tandem with rules to limit unnecessary cluster of claims in tort of Negligence. This is further examined in the next subheading.

Are the categories of Negligence so wide and open?

Lord Mc Millan stated that the categories of negligence are never closed, one may be tempted to ask whether this suggests that the categories are so wide to accommodate just any cases of negligence. The question of whether just any act of carelessness, recklessness, negligent, indifference, heedless act of another resulting from different relationship could amount to a tort in negligence is given a succint answer.

In Lochgelly Iron and coal v Mc Mullan, Lord Wright averred;

“In strict legal analysis, negligence means more than heedless or careless conduct, whether an omission or a commission; it properly connotes the complex duty, breach, and damages thereby suffered by the person to whom the duty is owing”.

Therefore, the locus Classicus case of Donoghue v Stevenson, sets out the criteria for determining the existence of a duty of care (neighborhood principle), proximity and foresight which acts a limitation to guard against frivolous and cluster of claims, where no duty existed. As in Edwards v West Herts Hospital Mgt. Committee, where it was held that a resident physician living in a staff hostel in the hospital cannot recover against the hospital , because the hospital owes no duty to the plaintiff to safeguard his property against theft by a third party who comes into the hostel.

Lord Atkin elucidated;

“acts or omissions which any moral code would censure cannot in a practical world…give a right to every person injured by them to demand relief. In this way rules of law arise which limit the range of complainants and the extent of their remedy”.

This erudite statement by Lord Atkin , is very succint, as he addressed the fact that while there may exist different or plethora cases on negligence, a rules of law arises to limit this, this rule becomes the “neighborhood principle”, from which standard duty of care evolved, which becomes the basis of the modern law of Tort of Negligence. Where there’s no legal duty owed,no liability arises.

…the rule that you love your neighbour became in law, you must not injure your neighbour….you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably forsee would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who then is my neighbor? ….persons who are closely and directly affected by my acts that I ought to reasonably to have them in contemplation as being so affected , when I am directing my mind to the act or omission which are called in question.

Therefore, in as much as Lord McMillan, no so

” However it is generally accepted in law that pulic policy that requires that a limit should be placed as to when the law Should impecede the Duty of Care and when it should not”.

Similarly, in Dorset Yatch co.ltd v Home office, Lord Denning Stated;

” It is, I think,at the bottom of matter of public policy which we as judges must resolve. This task of ‘duty’ or ‘no duty’ is simply a way of limiting the range of liability for negligence”.

Does the court have a role to play in expanding the categories of Negligence?

Having stated that the principles in law of Tort are judge made, that is from the erudite knowledge of judges in plethora cases, under the common law system. However, judges are wary of creating or expanding these categories of negligence. The judges duty as stated in Dorset Yatch co.ltd v Home office, is mainly to resolve each case on whether a duty arises or an absence of such duty in order to limit the influx or cluster of Negligence claims. It is important to note that the court does no concern itself with trivialities- Dominimis non curat lex.

In Leisbocsh Dredger v Edison Steamship, Lord Wright stated;

” The law cannot take account of e9 that follows from a wrongful act, it regards some subsequent matters as outside the scope of it’s selection, because it were infinite for the law to judge the cause of causes or consequences of consequences”.

Therefore, the judges are Keen to ensure only relevant situations or categories are developed without usurping other areas of law of Tort.

Does Lord Mc Millan’s dictum still hold water in our Nigerian Legal System?

As society develops, law too develops, along, in fact, law is one of the greatest instrument for changes and development. Certainly it is true, that denying the existence of a duty in some cases, the judge has done so on the ostensible ground that no such authority exists, but recently they have not hesitated to produce a new duty when it seemed right to do so. According to Lord Denning, ” if we never do anything which has never been done before, we shall never get anywhere”. The law will stand still while the rest of the world goes on, this will be bad…

fortunately, in some instances , the Nigerian Courts have followed and adopted some leading authorities in the development of tort of negligence in Nigeria. Although, sometimes, it is applied without modifications to suit our local exigencies.

Nevertheless, the Nigerian Courts are making tremendous progress in developing progressively on the tort of Negligence.

Factors that influence New Categories of Tort of Negligence

Some factors includes;

  1. Modernization and Industrialization Mechanism: this includes an upsurge in social relationships, technical know-how, production efficiency , computer and electronic age, which creates new situations for duty of care to arise. Examples are Software programs, as in Rubicon computers Ltd v United paints, Data privacy, etc.
  2. The Dynamism of Human Society: man is dynamic and subject to changes. Law is created for man, therefore as man evolved alongside societal elements, the need for emerging areas requiring legal protection and Regulations sets in.
  3. Preservation of Life: the law imposes a duty on professionals or alleged professionals to behave and carry out professional services in the most reasonable and prudent manner peculiar to such profession. Little Wonder, the medical and health practices are strictly regulated as any careless could lead to death. Occupiers Liability, negligent misstatement, all these serve to preeeve lifes, property of citizenship from unreasonable risk of harm.
  4. Regulation of human conducts, services, and products: areas such as manufacturing, production, sale( whether reataling or wholesaling), to ensure these novel areas are regulated to prevent defects and unreasonable risk to consumers as in Donoghue v Stevenson, Grant vAusta, etc.

Conclusion

Indeed, judges are endowed with reasoning prowess. Dictums from over centuries are still relevant today. Indeed, the Categories of Negligence are never closed, new situations would always arise, nevertheless, the classical case of Donoghue v Stevenson have set a bench mark to limit any cluster of liability in negligence claims.


About Author

Fortune Nkemakola Dikio is a student of Rivers State University, who is passionate about research and learning on various areas of Law.

Impact of Globalization on Collective Bargaining and Negotiation in Int. Labour Law – Sharma & Dr Raj

The Impact of Globalization on Collective Bargaining and Negotiation in International Labour Law

Abstract

Globalization has brought about significant changes to the global economy, including the way in which work is organized and conducted. While it has created new economic opportunities, globalization has also had significant impacts on labour rights and collective bargaining, and has led to increased exploitation and inequality for vulnerable workers.

This paper examines the historical context of globalization and labour law, and explores the various theories on the impact of globalization on labour rights and collective bargaining. It also analyses the legal frameworks and approaches to collective bargaining and negotiation in different countries and industries, evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each system.

Finally, the paper explores the implications for labour law and social justice, and offers recommendations for legal and policy changes to ensure fair labour practices in the global economy. The paper concludes with a discussion of areas for further research, including the role of technology, comparative analysis of legal frameworks, intersectional analysis, and longitudinal studies.

The impact of globalization on labour law and collective bargaining is a complex and multifaceted issue that has generated significant scholarly debate. While globalization has brought increased economic integration and growth, it has also created challenges for workers and labour regulations, particularly in developing countries. Scholars have examined the impact of globalization on labour standards, workers’ rights, and collective bargaining, and have explored the legal frameworks and policy changes necessary to ensure fair labour practices in the global economy.

This literature review examines existing studies on the topic, discussing the historical context of globalization and labour law, the theoretical debates over the impact of globalization on labour rights and collective bargaining, and the legal frameworks and approaches to labour regulation in different countries. It also highlights examples of how globalization has affected collective bargaining and negotiation in different countries and industries. The review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of each system and provides recommendations for legal and policy changes to ensure fair labour practices in the global economy.

Overall, this literature review highlights the importance of promoting social justice and human rights in the context of globalization, and identifies areas for further research. It argues that labour law and collective bargaining play a critical role in protecting workers’ rights and promoting workplace democracy, and that legal frameworks must be adapted to address the challenges of globalization and the changing nature of work.

The Meaning of Globalization

Globalization refers to the increasing interconnectedness and integration of economies, societies, and cultures around the world. It is driven by advances in technology, communication, and transportation that have made it easier and faster to move goods, capital, and people across borders. Globalization has transformed the way we live and work, creating new opportunities for trade, investment, and cultural exchange, but also posing significant challenges and risks.

At its core, globalization is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that affects various aspects of our lives in different ways. Economically, it has led to the growth of multinational corporations, the expansion of international trade, and the emergence of new global markets. Socially, it has facilitated the spread of ideas, values, and cultural practices across borders, and has created new opportunities for cross-cultural exchange and collaboration. Politically, it has challenged traditional concepts of national sovereignty and governance, and has raised new questions about global cooperation and governance.

However, globalization has also been criticized for exacerbating inequality, promoting exploitation of workers and resources, and undermining local cultures and traditions. These criticisms have led to debates about the proper role of global governance in regulating economic activity, protecting human rights and the environment, and promoting social and economic justice.

The meaning of collective bargaining and negotiation

Collective bargaining refers to the process by which workers, through their chosen representatives, negotiate with employers over the terms and conditions of their employment. This process typically involves the exchange of proposals, counterproposals, and concessions, with the goal of reaching a mutually acceptable agreement. Collective bargaining can cover a wide range of issues, including wages, benefits, working hours, and job security.

Negotiation, on the other hand, is a broader term that refers to the process of reaching an agreement through communication and compromise. Negotiation can take place between individuals or groups with differing interests, and can occur in various settings, including labour-management relations, business transactions, and international diplomacy.

In the context of labour relations, negotiation often involves collective bargaining between unions and employers, but it can also occur at the individual level between employees and managers. The key elements of negotiation include identifying interests, developing options, assessing alternatives, and reaching an agreement that meets the needs and priorities of all parties involved.

Importance of the impact of globalization on collective bargaining and negotiation in international labour law.

The impact of globalization on collective bargaining and negotiation in international labour law is an important topic for several reasons:

Labour rights: Collective bargaining and negotiation are essential tools for protecting the rights of workers and ensuring fair wages, benefits, and working conditions. However, the increasing globalization of the economy has made it more difficult for workers to exercise these rights, as multinational corporations often have more bargaining power than individual workers or even national governments. (Arthur, 1991)

Social justice: Labour rights are closely linked to social justice, as they affect the well-being and dignity of workers and their families. The impact of globalization on collective bargaining and negotiation can have significant social and economic consequences for workers and their communities, especially in developing countries.

Legal framework: The legal framework for collective bargaining and negotiation varies widely across different countries and regions. Understanding how globalization affects this framework can help policymakers and advocates develop more effective legal and policy solutions to protect workers’ rights and promote social justice.

Future of work: As the global economy continues to evolve, the role of collective bargaining and negotiation in labour relations will likely become even more important. By studying the impact of globalization on these tools, we can gain insights into how they can be adapted and strengthened to meet the challenges of the future of work. (Mclaren, 2017)

Historical context of globalization and labour law

The historical context of globalization and labour law is complex and multifaceted, with roots that date back to the Industrial Revolution of the 18th and 19th centuries. During this time, the growth of factory-based production and the rise of capitalist economies led to significant changes in the nature of work and employment. Workers were often subjected to harsh working conditions, long hours, and low wages, and had few legal protections or rights.

As the 20th century began, labour movements around the world began to organize and advocate for better working conditions and rights. This led to the creation of labour laws and regulations in many countries, which aimed to protect workers and ensure fair treatment. These laws established standards for wages, working hours, safety, and other important aspects of employment.

However, the process of globalization in the latter half of the 20th century and early 21st century has posed significant challenges to labour law and workers’ rights. Globalization has led to increased competition among countries and companies, and has facilitated the movement of capital and jobs across borders. This has created new challenges for labour law, which must navigate the complexities of cross-border employment relationships and multinational corporations.

The globalization of trade and investment has also led to the creation of international labour standards and regulations. Organizations such as the International Labour Organization (ILO) have played a key role in developing and promoting these standards, which aim to protect workers’ rights and ensure fair treatment in the global economy.

However, the effectiveness of these international labour standards and regulations is often limited by the lack of enforcement mechanisms and the resistance of some countries and corporations to abide by them. This has led to ongoing debates and challenges around the role of labour law and regulation in the global economy, and the need for greater cooperation and coordination among governments, businesses, and labour organizations to protect workers’ rights and ensure fair treatment in the global labour market.

Theories on the impact of globalization on labour rights and collective bargaining

There are a number of different theories on the impact of globalization on labour rights and collective bargaining. Some theorists argue that globalization has had a negative impact on labour rights and collective bargaining, while others suggest that globalization has had a more positive impact.

One theory that suggests a negative impact of globalization on labour rights and collective bargaining is the race-to-the-bottom theory. This theory argues that globalization has led to increased competition among countries and companies, and has facilitated the movement of capital and jobs to countries with lower labour standards and wages. This has created a “race to the bottom” in which countries and companies are forced to lower labour standards and wages in order to remain competitive. As a result, workers in many countries have seen their wages and working conditions decline and have had limited opportunities to bargain collectively or exercise their labour rights. (Novitz, 2016)

Another theory that suggests a negative impact of globalization on labour rights and collective bargaining is the “global commodity chain” theory. This theory argues that the globalization of production has led to the fragmentation of production processes across borders, with different parts of the production process located in different countries. This has made it difficult for workers to organize and bargain collectively, as their employers are often located in different countries or are part of complex global supply chains. As a result, workers may face significant challenges in exercising their labour rights and achieving better working conditions. (Lee, 2009)

However, there are also theories that suggest a more positive impact of globalization on labour rights and collective bargaining. One such theory is the “global governance” theory, which argues that globalization has led to the creation of international norms and regulations that promote labour rights and collective bargaining. For example, organizations like the International Labour Organization (ILO) have played a key role in developing and promoting international labour standards and regulations, which aim to protect workers’ rights and ensure fair treatment in the global economy. This has led to greater recognition of labour rights and collective bargaining as important components of global governance and has helped to promote better working conditions and labour standards in many countries. (Kucera, 2017)

Overall, the impact of globalization on labour rights and collective bargaining is complex and multifaceted. While some theorists argue that globalization has had a negative impact, others suggest that it has had a more positive impact through the creation of international norms and regulations that promote labour rights and collective bargaining.

Existing studies on the topic

There have been numerous studies on the impact of globalization on labour rights and collective bargaining, exploring a wide range of issues and perspectives. Some of the key findings and themes from existing studies include:

The negative impact of globalization on labour standards and wages. Many studies have found that globalization has led to a decline in labour standards and wages in many countries, particularly in industries that are subject to global competition. For example, a study by the International Labour Organization found that workers in many developing countries have experienced declining wages and worsening working conditions as a result of globalization. (International Labour Organization, n.d.)

The role of international labour standards and regulations in promoting labour rights and collective bargaining. Many studies have also explored the effectiveness of international labour standards and regulations in promoting labour rights and collective bargaining. Some studies have found that these standards and regulations have been effective in promoting better working conditions and labour standards in many countries, particularly in industries that are subject to global supply chains. However, other studies have highlighted the limitations of these standards and the challenges of enforcing them in practice. (Lee, 2009)

The importance of national labour laws and regulations. Many studies have also emphasized the importance of national labour laws and regulations in protecting workers’ rights and ensuring fair treatment in the global economy. These laws and regulations can provide important protections for workers, such as minimum wage standards, working hour limits, and protections against discrimination and harassment. However, the effectiveness of these laws and regulations can be limited by factors such as weak enforcement mechanisms and resistance from employers. (Novitz, 2016)

The role of labour unions and collective bargaining in promoting workers’ rights. Finally, many studies have explored the role of labour unions and collective bargaining in promoting workers’ rights and ensuring fair treatment in the global economy. These studies have highlighted the importance of unions and bargaining for improving wages and working conditions, particularly in industries that are subject to global competition. However, the effectiveness of unions and bargaining can be limited by factors such as weak legal protections for union organizers, anti- union policies by employers, and the fragmentation of production processes across borders. (Wilkinson, 2018)

Overall, existing studies on the impact of globalization on labour rights and collective bargaining have highlighted both the challenges and opportunities of this complex and multifaceted issue. While globalization has posed significant challenges for labour rights and

collective bargaining, there are also opportunities for promoting better working conditions and labour standards through the development and enforcement of international labour standards and regulations, as well as the strengthening of national labour laws and regulations and the role of unions and bargaining in promoting workers’ rights. (Wilkinson, 2018)

Examples of how globalization has affected collective bargaining and negotiation in different countries or industries.

Here are some examples of how globalization has affected collective bargaining and negotiation in different countries and industries:

Textile industry in Bangladesh: The textile industry in Bangladesh has experienced significant growth as a result of globalization and international trade. However, this growth has been accompanied by challenges for workers, including low wages and poor working conditions. The industry is highly fragmented and lacks strong unions, which has made it difficult for workers to negotiate better wages and working conditions. (Shukla, 2017)

Automotive industry in the United States: The automotive industry in the United States has been impacted by globalization through increased competition from foreign companies and the growth of global supply chains. As a result, many US automakers have shifted production to lower-wage countries, which has had a negative impact on collective bargaining and unionization rates. For example, the United Auto Workers (UAW) union has seen declining membership and bargaining power in recent years as a result of these challenges. (Cynthia S. Estlund, 2021)

Fast food industry in Europe: The fast food industry in Europe has been impacted by globalization through the growth of global supply chains and the increasing dominance of multinational corporations. This has made it difficult for workers to negotiate better wages and working conditions, as many fast food companies have adopted anti-union policies and resisted collective bargaining efforts. However, there have also been successful examples of unionization and collective bargaining in the fast food industry in Europe, such as the “Fast Food Forward” campaign in the UK.

Construction industry in Qatar: The construction industry in Qatar has experienced significant growth as a result of globalization and the country’s preparations for the 2022 FIFA World Cup. However, this growth has been accompanied by serious concerns about workers’ rights and working conditions, including low wages, long hours, and unsafe working conditions. Collective bargaining and unionization are limited in the construction industry in Qatar, which has made it difficult for workers to negotiate better wages and working conditions.

Electronics industry in China: The electronics industry in China has been impacted by globalization through the growth of global supply chains and the increasing dominance of multinational corporations. This has made it difficult for workers to negotiate better wages and working conditions, as many electronics companies have adopted anti-union policies and resisted collective bargaining efforts. However, there have also been successful examples of unionization and collective bargaining in the electronics industry in China, particularly in multinational companies with strong unions in their home countries. (Shukla, 2017)

These examples illustrate some of the complex and varied ways that globalization has impacted collective bargaining and negotiation in different countries and industries. While globalization has created significant challenges for workers’ rights and collective bargaining, there are also opportunities for promoting better working conditions and labour standards through the development and enforcement of international labour standards and regulations, as well as the strengthening of national labour laws and regulations and the role of unions and bargaining in promoting workers’ rights.

Analysis of the legal framework and its implications

The legal framework that governs collective bargaining and labour rights in the context of globalization is complex and multifaceted, and its implications can vary significantly depending on the specific context and country in question. In general, the legal framework consists of a combination of national labour laws and regulations, international labour standards and conventions, and trade agreements that impact labour rights and collective bargaining.

At the national level, labour laws and regulations set out the basic rights and protections for workers, including the right to form and join unions, the right to bargain collectively, and the right to strike. These laws and regulations can vary significantly between countries, and their implementation and enforcement can also vary depending on factors such as political and economic conditions, the strength of labour unions and other civil society organizations, and the level of government oversight and regulation.

At the international level, labour standards and conventions set out a common framework for promoting and protecting workers’ rights and collective bargaining. These standards and conventions are developed and promoted by organizations such as the International Labour Organization (ILO) and the United Nations, and they establish minimum standards for issues such as freedom of association, collective bargaining, child labour, and forced labour. While these standards and conventions are not legally binding in the same way as national laws and regulations, they can still have significant impact on the development of national labour laws and policies and the implementation of labour rights in practice. (International Labour Organization, n.d.)

Trade agreements can also have significant implications for labour rights and collective bargaining, as they can shape the economic conditions and regulatory framework in which workers operate. For example, many trade agreements include provisions related to labour standards and workers’ rights, such as requirements for member countries to uphold certain labour rights and protections. However, the impact of these provisions can vary depending on factors such as the level of enforcement and oversight, the strength of labour unions and other civil society organizations, and the overall economic and political context.

The implications of the legal framework for labour rights and collective bargaining can be significant, and can vary depending on factors such as the specific context and country in question. In general, a strong legal framework that upholds and protects workers’ rights and collective bargaining can help to promote better working conditions, higher wages, and greater economic and social stability. However, weak or poorly enforced labour laws and regulations,

or a lack of international standards and regulations, can lead to abuses of workers’ rights, lower wages, and greater economic and social inequality.

In conclusion, the legal framework that governs collective bargaining and labour rights in the context of globalization is complex and multifaceted, and its implications can vary significantly depending on the specific context and country in question. While a strong legal framework can help to promote better working conditions and greater economic and social stability, weak or poorly enforced labour laws and regulations can lead to abuses of workers’ rights and greater economic and social inequality.

Comparison of the legal frameworks and approaches to collective bargaining and negotiation in different countries.

The legal frameworks and approaches to collective bargaining and negotiation can vary significantly between countries, reflecting differences in political and economic systems, historical context, and cultural norms. Here are some examples of how the legal frameworks and approaches to collective bargaining and negotiation differ in different countries:

United States: In the United States, collective bargaining is governed by a combination of federal and state laws, including the National Labour Relations Act (NLRA). The NLRA establishes workers’ right to form and join unions, engage in collective bargaining, and strike. However, the legal framework for collective bargaining in the U.S. is generally weaker than in many other developed countries, and unionization rates have been declining in recent decades.

Germany: In Germany, collective bargaining is governed by a system of industry-wide collective bargaining agreements negotiated between unions and employers’ associations. These agreements set standards for wages, working conditions, and benefits that apply across entire industries. The German legal framework for collective bargaining is considered relatively strong, and unionization rates are higher than in many other developed countries.

Sweden: In Sweden, collective bargaining is also governed by industry-wide agreements negotiated between unions and employers’ associations. However, the Swedish system places a greater emphasis on cooperation between unions and employers, and the role of the state in mediating labour disputes is more prominent than in Germany. Unionization rates in Sweden are among the highest in the world.

China: In China, collective bargaining is governed by a combination of national laws and regulations, as well as local labour regulations that vary between provinces and municipalities. While workers have the right to form unions and engage in collective bargaining, in practice labour rights are often suppressed by the state, and independent unions are not allowed. Instead, unions are often controlled by the Communist Party or by management.

South Africa: In South Africa, collective bargaining is governed by the Labour Relations Act, which establishes workers’ right to form unions and engage in collective bargaining. However, the legal framework for collective bargaining in South Africa has been criticized for being too complex and for not adequately protecting workers’ rights.

These are just a few examples of the different legal frameworks and approaches to collective bargaining and negotiation in different countries. It is important to note that the legal

framework is only one factor that affects workers’ rights and collective bargaining, and that other factors such as the strength of labour unions, political and economic conditions, and cultural norms also play a significant role.

Evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of each system

evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the legal frameworks and approaches to collective bargaining and negotiation in the countries I mentioned earlier:

United States:

Strengths: The NLRA provides some protections for workers’ rights to form unions and engage in collective bargaining. The U.S. system is relatively flexible, allowing for a wide range of bargaining arrangements between unions and employers.

Weaknesses: The legal framework for collective bargaining in the U.S. is relatively weak compared to other developed countries. The NLRA has been criticized for not adequately protecting workers’ rights, and for allowing employers to engage in anti-union activities with minimal consequences.

Germany:

Strengths: The German system of industry-wide collective bargaining agreements provides a solid foundation for protecting workers’ rights and ensuring fair wages and working conditions. The system is highly centralized and coordinated, which can help to reduce conflict and promote cooperation between unions and employers.

Weaknesses: The German system can be inflexible, as wages and working conditions are often determined at the industry level rather than at the individual workplace level. Some critics argue that the system places too much power in the hands of unions and employers’ associations, which can lead to an uneven distribution of bargaining power.

Sweden:

Strengths: The Swedish system of industry-wide collective bargaining agreements is highly coordinated and cooperative, with a strong emphasis on partnership between unions and employers. The system has been successful in ensuring elevated levels of unionization and relatively low levels of labour conflict.

Weaknesses: Some critics argue that the Swedish system can be overly centralized, which can limit the ability of individual employers and workers to negotiate wages and working conditions. Additionally, the system has been criticized for being slow to adapt to changes in the labour market, such as the rise of non-standard work arrangements.

China:

Strengths: The Chinese legal framework for collective bargaining provides some protections for workers’ rights to form unions and engage in collective bargaining. The system is relatively flexible, allowing for a range of bargaining arrangements between unions and employers.

Weaknesses: In practice, the Chinese system is often characterized by limited worker protections and minimal enforcement of labour laws. Unions are often controlled by the Communist Party or by management, and workers who engage in collective action or try to form independent unions can face severe consequences.

South Africa:

Strengths: The South African legal framework for collective bargaining provides some protections for workers’ rights to form unions and engage in collective bargaining. The system is relatively flexible, allowing for a range of bargaining arrangements between unions and employers.

Weaknesses: The system can be overly complex, which can make it difficult for workers and employers to navigate. Additionally, the system has been criticized for not adequately protecting workers’ rights, particularly in the context of non-standard work arrangements such as temporary work and outsourcing.

It’s important to note that these evaluations are based on generalizations about the legal frameworks and approaches to collective bargaining and negotiation in each country, and that there is significant variation within each country based on factors such as industry, region, and the specific context of each bargaining relationship.

Predictions for how globalization will continue to affect collective bargaining and negotiation.

There is no doubt that globalization will continue to have a significant impact on collective bargaining and negotiation in the years to come. Here are a few potential predictions for how this might play out:

Increased competition: As globalization continues to create a more interconnected and competitive global economy, employers may feel pressure to reduce labour costs in order to remain competitive. This could lead to a continued erosion of worker bargaining power, particularly in industries that are highly exposed to global competition.

More cross-border collective bargaining: As global supply chains become increasingly complex, there may be more opportunities for workers and unions to engage in cross-border collective bargaining in order to ensure fair wages and working conditions across different countries and regions.

Greater emphasis on labour standards: With increased awareness of labour rights issues and growing public pressure to address labour abuses, there may be greater emphasis on labour standards in trade agreements and other international frameworks. This could create new opportunities for workers and unions to push for better labour protections and greater bargaining power.

Increased use of technology: As new technologies continue to reshape the global economy, they may also reshape the nature of work and the bargaining process itself. For example, remote work and digital platforms could make it easier for workers to organize across borders but could also create new challenges in terms of regulating and enforcing labour standards.

Overall, the future of collective bargaining and negotiation in the context of globalization is uncertain, and will depend on a range of economic, political, and social factors. However, it is clear that these issues will continue to be of critical importance for workers, unions, and policymakers in the years to come.

Recommendations for legal and policy changes to ensure fair labour practices in the global economy.

There are a number of legal and policy changes that could help to ensure fair labour practices in the global economy. Here are a few potential recommendations:

Strengthen international labour standards: One important step would be to strengthen international labour standards, such as those established by the International Labour Organization (ILO). This could involve creating stronger mechanisms for monitoring and enforcing labour standards, as well as ensuring that these standards are incorporated into trade agreements and other international frameworks.

Empower workers and unions: Workers and unions are critical stakeholders in the labour bargaining process, and empowering them can help to ensure fair labour practices. This could involve measures such as strengthening collective bargaining rights, supporting the right to strike, and creating stronger protections for workers against retaliation.

Address power imbalances: Power imbalances between workers and employers are a key challenge in the global economy. Addressing these imbalances could involve measures such as strengthening antitrust laws, regulating the power of multinational corporations, and ensuring that workers have access to legal representation and other forms of support.

Promote transparency: Transparency is a critical tool for ensuring fair labour practices, as it helps to expose labour abuses and hold employers accountable. Governments could promote transparency by requiring companies to disclose information about their labour practices, supporting independent monitoring and reporting, and creating whistle-blower protections.

Support worker-led initiatives: Finally, supporting worker-led initiatives can be an effective way to promote fair labour practices. This could involve supporting worker cooperatives and other forms of democratic ownership, as well as providing funding and other forms of support for worker-led organizations and campaigns.

Overall, ensuring fair labour practices in the global economy will require a multifaceted approach that involves a range of stakeholders, from workers and unions to governments and international organizations. By taking these and other steps, it may be possible to create a more just and equitable global labour system. (David G. Collings, 2009)

Conclusion

In summary, the topic of globalization and its impact on collective bargaining and negotiation is a complex and multifaceted issue. Existing studies suggest that globalization has both positive and negative impacts on labour rights and collective bargaining, and that the legal frameworks and approaches to these issues vary widely across different countries and industries.

Some potential recommendations for ensuring fair labour practices in the global economy include strengthening international labour standards, empowering workers, and unions, addressing power imbalances, promoting transparency, and supporting worker-led initiatives. However, the future of collective bargaining and negotiation in the context of globalization is uncertain, and will depend on a range of economic, political, and social factors.

The implications of globalization on labour law and social justice are significant. On one hand, globalization has the potential to create new economic opportunities, increase productivity, and improve standards of living around the world. On the other hand, it can also exacerbate inequality, undermine labour standards, and lead to exploitation of vulnerable workers.

From a legal standpoint, globalization has created a number of challenges for labour law. One key challenge is the difficulty of enforcing labour standards across borders, particularly in countries with weak or non-existent labour laws. This has led to a “race to the bottom,” in which companies seek out the cheapest labour possible, often at the expense of workers’ rights and well-being. Additionally, the rise of global supply chains has made it more difficult to hold companies accountable for labour violations, as responsibility is often dispersed across multiple countries and actors.

From a social justice perspective, globalization has had mixed impacts. While it has lifted millions of people out of poverty and created new opportunities for economic mobility, it has also contributed to rising inequality and labour exploitation. In particular, globalization has often led to the displacement of traditional industries and the erosion of stable, middle-class jobs, which can have significant social and psychological impacts on affected communities. It has also led to increased migration and displacement, which can create social and political tensions in both sending and receiving countries.

Overall, the implications of globalization for labour law and social justice are complex and multi-dimensional. While there are certainly opportunities for positive change, it is important to be aware of the potential risks and challenges associated with these changes, and to work towards legal and policy solutions that prioritize fairness, justice, and dignity for all workers.

In conclusion, the impact of globalization on labour rights and collective bargaining is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires further study and analysis. While globalization has the potential to create new economic opportunities and improve standards of living around the world, it can also lead to exploitation and inequality, particularly for vulnerable and marginalized workers. From a legal standpoint, the challenge of enforcing labour standards across borders and holding companies accountable for labour violations remains a significant challenge. From a social justice perspective, the displacement of traditional industries, erosion of stable jobs, and increased migration and displacement all have significant impacts on affected communities.

To address these challenges, there is a need for continued research and analysis into the impact of globalization on labour rights and collective bargaining. This research should take into account the role of technology, conduct comparative analysis of legal frameworks, consider the unique experiences of marginalized workers, and incorporate longitudinal studies to track trends and patterns over time. Ultimately, legal and policy solutions that prioritize fairness, justice, and dignity for all workers are necessary to ensure that the benefits of globalization are shared equitably and that no worker is left behind in the global economy.

Areas for further research

There are several areas for further research on the topic of globalization and its impact on collective bargaining and negotiation. Some of these include:

The role of technology: Technology has played an increasingly important role in shaping the global economy, and has significant implications for labour rights and collective bargaining. Further research is needed to understand how technological change is affecting workers and labour standards, and what legal and policy solutions may be necessary to ensure that workers are not left behind in the digital age.

Comparative analysis of legal frameworks: While there is some existing research on the different legal frameworks and approaches to collective bargaining and negotiation in different countries, further comparative analysis is needed to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of these systems, and to identify best practices for ensuring fair labour practices in the global economy.

Intersectional analysis: While much of the existing research on globalization and labour rights has focused on traditional industrial sectors, there is a need for more intersectional analysis that takes into account the unique experiences of marginalized and vulnerable workers, including women, people of colour, and migrant workers. This could help to shed light on the ways in which globalization intersects with other forms of oppression, and could inform legal and policy solutions that address these issues more effectively.

Longitudinal studies: Finally, there is a need for more longitudinal studies that track the impact of globalization on labour rights and collective bargaining over time. This could help to identify trends and patterns in the evolution of these issues, and could provide insights into the effectiveness of different legal and policy solutions over the long term

References

Arthur, J. B. (1991). Current Topics in Industrial and Labor Relations Research and Practice. SageJournals, 515-551.

Cynthia S. Estlund, W. L. (2021, June 30). Collective Bargaining Beyond Employment in the UnitedStates. Retrieved from papers.ssrn.com: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3861916

David G. Collings, G. T. (2009). HumanResourceManagementACriticalApproach.London.

International Labour Organization. (n.d.). Conventions and Recommendations. Retrieved from www.ilo.org: https://www.ilo.org/global/standards/introduction-to-international-labour- standards/conventions-and-recommendations/lang–en/index.htm

Kucera, D. &. (2017). Industrial Relations, Collective Bargaining and the gig economy. InternationalLabourReview, 335-357.

Lee, S. (2009). Impact of Globalization on Labor Standards: A Literature Review. Journal of BusinessEthics, 75-88.

Mclaren, J. (2017). Globalization and Labor Market Dynamics. AnnualReviews.

Novitz, T. (2016). Labour Law, Human Rights and Social Justice. In Oxford Handbook of ComparitiveLaw(pp. 1182-1200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shukla, R. J. (2017). Impact of Globalization on Human Resource Practices. Indian Journal ofIndustrialRelations, 496-507.

Wilkinson, A. (2018). Impact of Globalization on Employement Relations: Implications for HRM. In Research on Comparitive Human Resource Management (pp. 203-222). Edward Elgar Publishing.


About Authors

1. Rakshit Sharma (Author) is a student of Amity Law School, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India. He loves cycling. He published his first article on LawGlobal Hub in September, 2022, and became a volunteer in January, 2023.

2. Dr Abhilasha Raj (Coauthor) is an Assistant Professor at Amity Law School, Noida, Uttar Predesh, India.

Why Multinational Companies Do Not Make Nigeria The Venue And Seat Of Arbitration – ONI Oluwatoyin Bamidele

Why Multinational Companies Do Not Make Nigeria The Venue And Seat Of Arbitration

Despite the numerous advantages of Arbitration and ADR to the global economy, Nigeria has steadily witnessed a slow-paced development in the settlement of commercial disputes through arbitration and other ADR mechanisms, majority of the Multinational companies with huge transactions and high-profile Commercial disputes have continually made foreign countries the venue and seat of Arbitration.

Numerous Arbitral proceedings are conducted outside Nigeria even though the commercial disputes occurred in Nigeria. Unfortunately, this has led to low patronage of Nigerian Arbitrators and the increasing volume of arbitrable disputes In Nigeria has not translated into many businesses for Nigerian Arbitrators.

In a bid to foster the growth of arbitration in Nigeria, Numerous legal luminaries have urged businesses and legal practitioners to make Nigeria the seat and venue of arbitration especially where the subject-matter of the dispute is connected to Nigeria.

At the 2022 Annual Conference of the Nigerian Institute of Chartered Arbitrators (NICArb), The Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, SAN noted that making Nigeria the seat and venue of Arbitration in commercial agreements would enhance foreign direct investment and further boost the Country’s economy.

While some persons have attributed these concerns to the lack of confidence in Nigerian Arbitrators, it is pertinent to state that there are other reasons why this menace exists.

The major reasons why Multinational Companies do not make Nigeria the seat and venue of Arbitration are:

  1. The ease with which arbitral agreements and awards are dismissed by Nigerian Courts on ground of technicalities;

A classic example of this discouraging circumstance is the decision of the Court of appeal in Mekwunye v. Imoukhuede, it took the intervention of the supreme court to overturn this decision and despite the Supreme court’s decision, it took 12 years between 2007 when the arbitral award was made and 2019 when the Supreme Court finally laid the matter to rest.

In Mekwunye’s case (supra), the Court of Appeal had indeed set aside the Arbitral award based on a minor error on the executed agreement; the arbitration clause had wrongly referred to the appointing authority as “Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, London, Nigeria Branch,” instead of “Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, UK, Nigeria Branch”.

The Court of appeal dismissed the arbitration agreement and the arbitral award on the ground that the name of appointing authority was wrongly written. This decision brought distrust and uncertainties to the future of commercial arbitration in Nigeria as no Company would want to have its commercial disputes resolved in a country where judicial intervention is capable of setting aside an arbitral award at any cost on the ground of technicalities.

  1. Delays and bottlenecks in enforcement of arbitral awards and appeals;

Even though the 2018 World Bank index on ease of doing business ranked Nigeria as 96th in enforcement of contract and stated that it takes about 454 days to enforce a contract through the court, The length and stress involved in enforcement of arbitral awards in Nigeria is not entirely pleasant for commercial activities as profits from arbitral awards may remain inaccessible for a long time due to the number of days involved before enforcement is achieved.

Aside from the long duration in enforcement of arbitral awards, another major challenge is the duration of appeals; appeals may be pending for 8 to 10 years if taken from the High Court to the Supreme Court.

In providing a solution to this menace, The Nigerian Institute of Chartered Arbitrators (NICArb) has suggested that specialized commercial courts be established to tackle the delays in enforcement of arbitral awards. It is also suggested that the leave of Court should first be sought and obtained before an application to challenge an arbitral award or an appeal against the enforcement of an award is brought before the court. 

  1. long overdue laws which do not embrace recent global trends in International Commercial Arbitration;

The principal enactment governing the practice of Arbitration in Nigeria is the Arbitration and Conciliation Act which was enacted in 1988 and now long overdue for a change. There are numerous 21st century advancements which are not yet applicable in Nigeria due to delays in enactment of a new Arbitration and Mediation Act. The National Assembly has passed a bill known as the Arbitration and Mediation Bill 2022 (the “Bill”), The Bill represents a significant upgrade from its predecessor but unfortunately the bill is still awaiting Presidential Assent since 10th of May 2022.

In conclusion, there is need to develop a national policy on Arbitration, ensuring that trades and contracts executed in Nigeria had embedded in them an Arbitration clause which makes Nigeria the venue and seat of Arbitration and thereby promoting job creation and economic growth. As a full or part-time Arbitrator, what is key is having jobs or services to render. Nigerians get trained in ADR and Arbitration with the hope that they will make a viable career and also make a living. Unfortunately, they are faced with a lack of opportunities to practice the skills.

References:

  • Suit No. SC/851/2014: Dr. Charles Mekwunye V Christian Imoukhuede (Judgment delivered on 7th of June 2019)
  • Prof. Olubayo Oluduro, PhD (Ghent), FCArb. & Akin Olawale Oluwadayisi, Ph.D. (Ilorin) (2021) Journal on Arbitration volume 16  Number 1 ISSN: 2021-957x pp. 1-165
  • Urska Velikonja, ‘Making Peace and Making Money: Economic Analysis of the Market for Mediators in private practice,’ 72 (2009) Albany Law Review, 257-291 at 271

Photo Credit: Difference Between


About Author

Oluwatoyin Bamidele Oni is a Corporate-Commercial Lawyer and a writer whose works are widely published. He has attended numerous workshops and trainings both in Arbitration, Project Finance, Infrastructure and PPP, mergers, and acquisition.

The Illegality and Burden of Enforcement of the 8th February 2023 Supreme Court Interim Order Suspending the Implementation of the Deadline for Circulation of the Old Nigerian Currency Notes – Manfred Ekpe, Esq.

The Illegality and Burden of Enforcement of the 8th February 2023 Supreme Court Interim Order

Since Nigeria’s  President Muhammadu Buhari decided to oversee the reformation of the electoral system for entrenchment of democracy in the country to ensure that credible and  popular candidates emerge elected as against “selection electoral system” that has bedeviled our political system for over two decades with its attendant bad rule,  there has been lots of fights by a powerful and institutionalized corruption syndicate to thwart the effort. It is multi- headed corruption fighting back.

The Background Fact

Flowing from the above introductory background, the first fight  was the heavy mobilization of the federal legislators elected on the platform of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) to kill in the bud the earliest step to a free and fair election, which was mobilization in the National Assembly  against the enactment of the new Electoral Act that allows deployment of anti- rigging technology for elections  Thanks to the legislators on the platform of the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and other opposition political parties who mobilized against that sabotage and saw the 2022 Electoral Bill passed.

Secondly, upon the announcement of the Naira redesign, the  migration from cash to cashless economy, and other strict monetary policies aimed  against, inter alia, vote buying, the very powerful corruption syndicate tried to use the Senate and House of Representatives to kill the policy.

The Senate had issued a resolution on or about 16/12/2023 to stop the implementation of the deadline for the use old Naira Notes because the corruption syndicate have over the years stashed trillions of Naira in the old currency notes in preparation for vote buying to beat the Anti-Rigging technology deployed by the Independent Electoral Commission (INEC).  Prior to the redesign of the Naira Notes and outlawing of the old currency notes to frustrate this syndicate, the CBN statistics haf revealed that more than 70% of the money in circulation in Nigeria were in private hands, most buried in the ground by corrupt politicians for heavy vote buying to compromise the reformed electoral system, hence the need, inter alia to frustrate the rogues by the strict monetary policy.  Again at another instance, the National Assembly  issued another resolution asking for the new naira notes to be allowed as legal tender till June 2023 or thereabouts

This resolution was seen by many Nigerians as inordinate, aimed at helping the corrupt politicians make use of their stolen and stashed old notes to buy votes in the February and March general elections, to buy Judgments in pre-election matters that ends in March and to buy Judgments for post election matters that ends in May.

However, the determined CBN Governor, Mr. Godwin Emefiele rightly defied the resolution since the National Assembly has no power to regulate monetary policy except the CBN. National Assembly resolutions too are not legally binding but advisory. The CBN chose not to be so advised.

Next, media blackmail was launched against the CBN Governor Godwin Emefiele especially on Brekete TV and other TV and Radio Houses owned by the corrupt politicians. This was apparently aimed at destroying his reputation and goodwill in preparation for the next phase of the plot that would soon be exposed.

That next phase was to give Emefiele the Ibrahim Maku treatment. The corruption syndicate used the secret police known as the SSS (State Security Service) to put up trumped up charges on the CBN Governor accusing him of  “terrorism financing, fraudulent activities and economic crimes of national security dimension.”

The SSS, to justify the arrest of the CBN Governor smuggled into court by an Ex parte (secret) Application in suit no. FHC/ABJ/CS/2022 before Chief Justice John Tsoho of the Federal High Court Abuja for an arrest warrant to arrest the CBN Governor and detain him for two weeks.

The Hon. Chief judge declining the grant  of the order said, among other things, that no sufficient probable cause was given to warrant an order to arrest such a national officer of economic importance like the CBN Governor with its attendant effect and the shock it would have on national economy etc. Courts of law as courts of public policy are expected to weigh the social, economic and other effects that a court order might  have in juxtaposition with the real need to issue such order. The courts are duty bound to weigh the balance of convenience in issuing ex parte orders. In my view the Honourable Chief Justice John Tsoho had lifted the pride of the judiciary.

That having failed,  another effort at thwarting the electoral reformation was for the SSS to, on or about 24 /12/2022, in ignominious defiance of a subsisting court order in suit no. FHC/ABJ/CS/2255/2022 between State Security Service (applicant) and Godwin Emefiele (respondent).barring the SSS and or any security agencies from arresting the CBN Governor,  deployed its personnel everywhere in the country to arrest the CBN Governor on sight upon his  expected return from vacation in the United States. It took only the intervention of HE  President Buhari to call the SSS and other security agencies to order, the president knowing the game of the corruption syndicate.

Lastly the 36 State Governors acting  through the instrumentality of three most shameless northern governors of Kogi, Zamfara and Kaduna States filed an ex parte motion at the Supreme Court on 30/02/2023 in suit no. SC/CV/162/2013, and on 8/2/2023 the supreme court in a unanimous decision issued a seven day interim order against the Federal Government against implementing the deadline for the old Naira Notes being legal tender on 11/2/2023.

But does the supreme court have power to give such order?  If no, what is the legal effect of such order? Let us look at what the law says.

Legal Analysis

The Supreme Court of Nigeria is the first judicial son of the Nigerian Constitution 1999 (As Altered) (hereinafter, the Constitution),  which confers on the apex court power or Jurisdiction to adjudicate on legally cognizable disputes.
Section 232(1) of the constitution confers on the Supreme Court what is termed ORIGINAL JURISDICTION  in disputes between the Federation and a State or between States.

With the powers conferred on the National Assembly to make laws  for additional Jurisdiction to the supreme court, the National Assembly enacted  section 1(1)(a) of the Supreme Court (Additional Original Jurisdiction) Act 2002, which provides that in addition to the original jurisdiction conferred on the Supreme Court by Section 232(1) of the Constitution, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in any dispute between (a) the National Assembly and the President; (b) the National Assembly and any State House of Assembly; and (c) the National Assembly and the State, so long as that dispute involves any question of law or fact which the existence or extent of a legal right depends.

The above combined provisions of sections 232(1) of the constitution and section 1(1)(a) of the Supreme Court (Additional Original Jurisdiction) Act 2002, is to the effect that  the only legal disputes upon which the supreme court can exercise original jurisdiction are those listed, and nothing more. The supreme court cannot arrogate power to itself not conferred on it by law.
On the other hand, section 251(1) of the  constitution establishes the Federal High Court and vests on it power TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION TO THE EXCLUSION OF ANY OTHER COURT ON MATTERS CONCERNING THE POWERS OF THE CBN INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO MONETARY POLICY AND LEGAL TENDER.

For emphasis, I seek indulgence to quote in letters inter alia the provisions of section 251(1)(d) of the constitution, thus:—
251(1) “Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this constitution and in addition to such other jurisdiction as may be conferred upon it by an Act of the National Assembly, the Federal High Court shall have and exercise jurisdiction to the *exclusion of any other Court in civil causes and matters…*”
(a)……
(b)……
(c)…….
(d)     “connected with or pertaining to banking, banks, other financial institutions including any action between one bank and another, *any action by or against the Central Bank of Nigeria arising from banking, foreign exchange, coinage, legal tender*, bills of exchange, letters of credit, promissory notes and other fiscal measures; Provided that this paragraph shall not apply to any dispute between an individual customer and his bank in respect of transactions between the individual customer and the bank;”
(Emphasis in bold and underlining, mine)

It is therefore my humble but firm submission that the learned Lords of the supreme court erred by accepting Jurisdiction to hear the matter in the first place.

It is trite that any legal findings, orders and decisions arising from proceedings of a court of law without Jurisdiction is a nullity ab initio and ex debito justitiea liable to be set aside. It is unenforceable.
On whether the CBN ought to have obeyed the order except and until set aside by the supreme court, the answer is yes but only to the extent that in the circumstances of this case where the CBN was not  party to the suit, it was not legally bound by the order.

It is established principle of our common law jurisprudence that any findings, order or Judgment from an action in personam is not legally binding on a non-party to the action.

The dictum of the Court of Appeal per Muhammad Lawal Garba J.C.A,  reading the leading Judgment in the case of THE VESSEL MT. SEA TIGER & ANOR v. ACCORD SHIP MANAGEMENT (HK) LIMITED & ORS (2020) LPELR-49498 (CA), comes into mind where the learned justices of appeal held inter alia thus:

 “…an order made or decision taken by a Court against a person who is not a party to a case is not binding on such a person and so made in vain since it cannot be enforced against him.”

Consequences of defying court order is committal to prison of the contemnor (person in contempt). The three governors who are plaintiffs in the suit have the duty to cite the CBN Governor, Godwin Emefiele for contempt for purportedly disobeying that supreme court order. But why have they not done so?It is because they know that the order is not binding on the CBN as a non-party, and that such judicial expedition will fail thus exposing the politics in the whole drama.

On Whether the Three Plaintiffs State Governments Have Legally Cognizable Cause of Action  Arising From Monetary Policy  Against the Federal Govt Thus Vesting the Original Jurisdiction on the Supreme Court?

On 9/2/2023, I watched the erudite learned silk, Chief Mike Ozekhome reason that since the State Govt has issues arising from the monetary policy with the FGN, therefore the supreme court seems to have original jurisdiction. And that it may require amicus curiae (legal luminaries as friends of the court) to be invited by the supreme court to help resolve the novel legal puzzle.

With respect to the learned silk I beg to differ from this reasoning. This case, to my mind is  a straightforward case not novel,  not a legal puzzle, and that does not require amicus curiae. It does not call for the creation of a juristic mountain out of a juristic anthill of what is afterall a simple question of construction of,  and interpreting a clear and straightforward wordings of written law.
To answer the question, we must look at the constitutional and statutory duty of the FGN cum the duty of the president of Nigeria whether it includes regulation of monetary policy.

Sections 130 and 5 of the constitution creates the office, powers and duties of the  President of Nigeria. None of the duties of the president therein established concerns power of  regulation of monetary policy. The power to regulate  monetary policy including legal tender is donated absolutely to the CBN under sections 17 of  the Central Bank of Nigeria Act No.7 of 2007 (hereinafter, the CBN Act). The CBN is personified in the Governor of the CBN as corporate sole and juristic person who can sue and be sued in its name but not as an “agent” of the Federal Government as personified in the President.

Flowing from the forgoing, sections 1(3) and  17 of the CBN Act vests exclusive power on the CBN to, inter alia, issue currency notes and coins and regulate monetary policy “to the exclusion of the Federal Govt, State Govt and Local Govt, or any person or Authority.”  Read also sections 18 and 19 of the CBN Act together with section 17 supra, which details the duties of the CBN.

Therefore, by the combined effect of sections 130 and 5 of the constitution, and sections 17, 18 and 19 of the CBN Act, the FGN has no power to regulate monetary policy but only the CBN “to the exclusion of the FGN, State Govts and Local Govts”. Pursuant to  the foregoing,  State Govts have no legal cognizable cause of action against the FGN as related to regulation of monetary policy. It is my humble but firm submission therefore that Suit No. SC/CV/165/2023 between the Governments or Governors  of Kaduna, Kogi and Zamfara States and the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) as representing the Federal Government is therefore incompetent since the cause of action thereof does not arise from the duty and obligation of the FGN under any known law. There is therefore no legally cognizable conflict between the States and the Federation that should donate original jurisdiction to the supreme court to adjudicate upon.

The plaintiffs only  tried to conjure, like necromancers, legally cognizable cause of act between the State and the Federation by complaining how the CBN policy affects money circulation and the attendant riots and breakdown of law and order in parts of the country. This complaint does not vest original jurisdiction on the Supreme Court anyway. Assuming without conceding it does,  of course it is judicially noticeable that the Governors themselves are the ones conniving with managers of deposit money banks to hoard the new currency notes thereby depriving the ordinary citizens access to the new currency notes. Banks have been shown in the media by security agencies  to hoard the new currency notes for the purpose of  exporting them  out of the bank vaults for politicians including the governors to stockpile for vote being in an election that is just two weeks ahead. This causes the artificial scarcity. As reported in the news, the citizens are turning their anger on the banks for conniving with the politicians to deprive them of their money. Therefore the plaintiffs cannot hope to exploit that self induced situation to approach the court to help them benefit from their own wrong, which is against the established legal principle that the law does not allow one to benefit from his own wrong, expressed in the legal locution Nullus Commodum Capere Protect De Injuria Sua Propria.

If there is any triable dispute in the circumstances of this case, it should be between the concerned State Govts and the CBN, whereupon, under the combined effect of sections 17, 18 and 19 of the CBN Act, and section 251(1)(d) of the constitution, only the Federal High Court  can exercise original jurisdiction.
Notwithstanding the immediate paragraph above, I venture to reason that it seems to appear that  by the unified effect of sections 1(3), and 17 of the CBN Act which bars the FGN, State Govts, Local Govts or any person and Authority from interfering with the monetary regulatory powers of the CBN, the State Govts and any person and Authority lack the powers to interfere with the lawful duty of the CBN, and the Supreme Court being a person in the eyes of the law, is bereaved of any power to interfere with the strategy deployed by the CBN in regulating monetary policy except it is shown that such strategy is not in compliance with the extant  laws. That is not the case. Even in such instance, the Supreme Court’s power would be only to the extent of ordering the CBN to abide by the extant laws in the performance of its function. I must say that it is my candid opinion that the interference with the exclusive duty of the CBN by the Supreme Court by issuing the February 8, 2023 restraining order against the CBN monetary policy is ultra vires, and in violation of the doctrine of Separation of Powers as mirrored through the Political Question Doctrine.

In  further adumbration of the above, the Supreme Court is bereaved of jurisdiction to  issue any order giving direction on how the  regulation of the monetary policy of the CBN should follow by way of stopping, even if temporarily, deadline for circulation of old currency notes under the facts and circumstances it did when there was no prima facie evidence before the judex that the deadline was in violation of any law for the time being in force in Nigeria.

It is clear from the provisions of the CBN Act that it was not within the envisagement of the lawmakers that the court of law which is not financial expert should take over the duty of the CBN which is the expert on financial matters.

In my legal opinion, it would be a different kettle of fish had the governors supposedly as conscientious stakeholders of the nation complained of the violation of the provisions of the law by the CBN in the determination of the deadline for the old currency notes to cease being legal tender, and brought an action before a court of competent jurisdiction, namely, the Federal High Court for an order compelling the CBN to execute its duty within the confines of the law. But no, the Plaintiff Governors  have not accused the CBN of violating any law in issuing the monetary policy. I submit with respect that their claim is frivolous, incompetent and unjusticiable.

Effect of Section 20 of the Cbn Act

Some legal minds argue that since section 20 of the CBN Act subjects the acts of the CBN Governor to the control of the president, then by suing the FGN through the AGF, the CBN is deemed sued and legally bound. Their argument seeks to conjure up the principle of agency where it applies not.

With respect this reasoning is foreign to our common law jurisprudence. Since 1896 it has been established in England from where we derive our Jurisprudence that juristic personae such as the CBN have a life of its own and can sue or be sued in their names. See the locus classicus case of Salomon v. Salomon (1896) UKHL1. In support of this jurisprudential reasoning is the provision of section 1(2) of the CBN Act which makes the CBN a legal person (juristic personae) which can be sued and sue in its name. Therefore the principle of Qui facit per alium facit per se, meaning “He who acts through another does the act himself” as alluded to by some of our brilliant legal minds,  vis-à-vis the law of agency, does not apply in the relationship between the FGN and the CBN, and the one cannot be held responsible for the act or omission of the other.

An instance is the Nigeria Police Force (NPF) being an agency of the Executive Arm of Government, but the act or omission of the NPF cannot be inputted on the FGN. The NPF being a juristic personae under the Police Act,  like the CBN is sued by its name through its officers.

Therefore, an attempt to reconstruct the purport of section 20 of the CBN Act in efforts to breath life into the dead supreme court injunctive order of 8/2/2023 against the CBN, which in any case, was not a party to the suit,  is with respect, a mere academic exercise.

Effect of the Cbn Having Not Been a Party to the Suit

I have read legal opinions of several respected senior jurists in the country who claim that the CBN must obey the supreme court order of 8/2/2023 citing nonbinding case laws in persuasive grandstanding and morality leapfrogging.

It is trite that the findings, order and decree of a court in an action in personam is not binding on a person who was not a party to the suit. The dictum of the Court of Appeal per Muhammad Lawal Garba J.C.A,  reading the leading Judgment in THE VESSEL MT. SEA TIGER & ANOR v. ACCORD SHIP MANAGEMENT (HK) LIMITED & ORS (2020) LPELR-49498 (CA), comes into mind where the learned justices of appeal held inter alia thus, “…an order made or decision taken by a Court against a person who is not a party to a case is not binding on such a person and so made in vain since it cannot be enforced against him.”

In the reinforcement of the position of the law on the nonbinding effect of the said supreme court order on the CBN, it is established principle of law that where a necessary party to a suit was not joined in the suit, the entire proceedings and its outcome is a nullity ab initio as it violates the universal and nonderogable legal principle of audi altarem partem guaranteed and fortified in section 36(1) of the constitution. On any question of monetary policy in Nigeria, the CBN is a necessary party. See section 17 CBN Act.

In the case of N.B.A. v. Kehinde (2017) 11 NWLR (Pt. 1576) 225 a necessary party was defined as a person who should be bound by the result and the question to be settled in the legal question in issue and in whose absence the issues cannot be completely settled. Therefore, there must be a question in the action which cannot be effectually and completely settled unless he is a party.

Flowing from the above legal principle, by virtue of the sole duty of the CBN as the only Authority authorized by law to issue and regulate currency and monetary policy in Nigeria to the exclusion of all others, there is no way the question of currency regulation complained of by plaintiffs could be properly and completely settled without hearing from the CBN. Therefore, for not joining the CBN in the suit the entire proceedings and injunctive relief is the  said  suit no. FHC/ABJ/CS/126/2022 ordering the CBN to suspend temporarily the deadline for the circulation of the new currency notes, is illegal, null and void and is ex debito justitiea liable to be set aside by the application of the CBN of the AGF or suo motu. For this reason the CBN was not legally bound by the order in question made against it, and so violated nothing in implementing the deadline. I so submit.

Conclusion

Given the checkered antecedent and  tortuous journey of the Buhari Administration’s vow to reform perhaps the most corrupt electoral system in the world, and the use of national institutions by the corruption syndicate to try to thwart this patriotic effort, which is in the public domain as adumbrated in The introductory paragraphs supra, the supreme court as the holy of holies in the temple of justice, a court of justice, of equity and of public policy, to my mind, ought to have taken judicial notice of these facts which would guide it against issuing the most unfortunate injunction against the CBN by ex parte Motion.

The supreme court ought to have ordered the plaintiffs to put the FGN on notice, but should not have made an ex parte Order on such a delicate matter having to do with national security and national economy. Had the learned justices of the supreme court heard from the AGF as representing the FGN, they would not have issued the injunction without Jurisdiction to the do so, which causes lawyers and laypeople alike to seethe with anger and distrust of our legal system thereby reducing the sacred temple of justice   to attack by the non-initiates occassioning what to my mind is an avoidable public opprobrium which seems to  strip the judiciary bay of its majestic mystique and dignifying grandeur. I however defer to my Most Distinguished Lords of the Supreme Court to decide the position of the law.


Photo Credit: PUNCH Newspapers


About Author

Manfred Ekpe, Esq. is an upcoming Nigerian Human Right Activist, Public Commentator, Author and lawyer.

Administration of Estate in Nigeria – Ahmad Alhaji Maina

Administration of Estate

Administration of estate is the process whereby the personal representative collects in the assets of the estate and then meet the debts and liabilities and pay out the legacies and devices before distributing the residue, managing the estate as necessary in the meantime.

The funds in the estate must first be applied to meet debts and liabilities. The funeral expenses come first, and then the administration expenses and the debts of the deceased at his death. Debts arising after death and next, followed by any specific gift and then general gifts. Only after this can the residue be ascertained.

The personal representatives may be personally liable to those who surfer if they do not carry out the administration properly. There are however systems for them to protect themselves against the possibility of claims arising after they have distributed the estate.

To ascertain all the debts and liabilities, they must not only go through the deceased’s papers but also advertise for creditors in accordance with S27 of the Trustee Act 1925. If the personal representatives know of the existence of a beneficiary but cannot trace him, they may be able to seek a ‘Benjamin’ order enabling them to distribute the estate as though he had predeceased. In both cases the personal representatives are protected from personal liability should further claimants appear after the estate has been distributed.

The personal representatives have certain powers of administration and management of the estate under statue, but these are generally considered to be very inadequate and they are usually widened in any professionally-drawn Will. Where an estate arises after 1996 and includes land, however, the powers are much wider by virtue of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Truetees Act 1996. Certain obligations to make complex calculations as between beneficiaries entitled in succession to each other, in order to preserve equality between them, are also commonly excluded in any case where they might arise.

Where a personal representative passes land, this may be done by written assent under S36 of the Administration of Estate Act 1925. A personal representative may also appropriate assets in satisfaction of gift under S41 of the AEA 1925, with certain limited obligations to obtain consents. The need to obtain those consents is often excluded by will.

The beneficiaries probably have no proprietary interest in the property in the estate, although they have the chose in action of the right to ensure due administration of the estate. A residuary beneficiary probably obtains an interest when the residue is ascertained, but not before. There is authority for saying that a specific beneficiary may obtain some from of equitable interest in the relevant property at death.

If the estate is insolvent and cannot even meet all its debts, they must be paid out in the order set out in S34(1) of the AEA 1925. Debts charged on specific property are covered separately by S35. S35(3) and Pt II, Sched1 of the AEA1925 set out the statutory order of application of assets to debts where the estate is solvent, though this statutory provision may be varied by the will. It is unclear whether this statutory order for the payment of debts may also be applied to the setting aside of a fund to meet pecuniary legacies when paying out for debts interacts with the provision under S33for the payment of pecuniary legacies on a partial intestacy.

A personal representative may be liable in devastavit or breach of trust for failing properly to administer the estate, but if he has acted in good faith and reasonable he may seek relief from the court under S61of the Trustee Act1925.

A beneficiary who has lost out because the estate has not been properly administered may go against the personal representatives. If however they are unable to satisfy him (because they do not have enough money) he may also have rights of action and in equity against the recipient of the property or may be able to trace the money or property which has been paid over. This may also apply to the subject of the Benjamin order who turns up later and cannot pursue the personal representatives.

References

Principles of Succession, Wills & Probate by CAROLINE SAWYER. Second Edition.

Equity And Trusts In Nigeria_2nd Edition by J.O. FABUNMI

About Author

Ahmad Alhaji Maina is a student of the Faculty of Law, Yobe state university, Damaturu, Nigeria.

Evidence of Similar Facts (Rule, Exceptions, Cases, Nigeria)

Similar Facts Evidence

Similar Facts evidence connotes proving a fact before the court by relying on past dealings of the defendant which are similar to the issue at hand. It is applicable to both criminal and civil proceedings.

As a general rule, Evidence of Similar Facts is not admissible in trial. However, this is subject to certain exceptions derived from common law and the Nigerian Evidence Act, 2011.

Similar fact evidence is one of the four exclusionary rules of evidence. Others include Hearsay, Character, and Opinion evidence. Most of the rules of similar facts are derived largely from common law, a major source in the Nigerian corpus juris.

Assuming Mr A stole a car belonging to Mrs B. Thereafter, A was arrested, charged and convicted for stealing punishable under Section 383 of the Nigerian Criminal Code1, as well as Section 286(1) of the Penal Code2. And on a later date, A is being prosecuted for the theft of C’s car. If the prosecution at trial, intends to adduce the previous criminal conduct of the accused for the purpose of concluding that he is guilty of the present charge, he will be resorting to Similar facts evidence.

See also: Difference between the Criminal code and Penal Code

Delivering the leading judgment in Nurudeen Adewale Arije V. Federal Republic Of Nigeria (2014) LPELR-CA/L/770/2009, Samuel Oseji, J.C.A., stated that, “… The whole essence of excluding evidence of an accused person’s previous disposition is premised on the principle that, if admitted, would be prejudicial to him in the actual trial he is currently facing.”

In the criminal case of Makin v. Attorney-General for New South Wales (1894) AC 57, Lord Herschell stated the general rule as follows:

“It is undoubtedly not competent for the prosecution to adduce evidence tending to show that the accused has been guilty of criminal acts other than those covered by the indictment for the purpose of leading to the conclusion that the accused is a person likely from his criminal conduct or character to have committed the offence for which he is being tried. …”

Therefore in criminal cases, similar facts evidence is excluded from being used in proving the guilt of the accused person.

This statement has been given judicial credence in a plethora of cases, including the case of R v. Ball (1911) AC 47, Thompson v. R (1918) AC 221 and R v. Thomas (1958) 3 FSC 8.

The application of the inadmissibility of Evidence of Similar Facts in civil cases is seen in the case of Hodingham v. Head (1858) 27 L.J.C.P 241. The issue in this case was whether the contract between the plaintiff and defendant was subject to certain terms. Evidence showing that similar contracts entered by the plaintiff were subject to the same special terms were held inadmissible. See also Brown v. Lambeth Corporation 32 T.L.R 61; Holcombe v. Hewton (1810) 3 Camp 391.

In all, the general rule in Similar Facts Evidence is to the effect that the fact that a person acted or reacted in one way at one time, does not make it probable that he acted that way at another time. Therefore, similar facts are inadmissible in proving either the guilt of the accused or the wrong of the defendant.

Exceptions to the exclusion of Similar Facts Evidence

There are exceptions in both criminal and civil cases relating to the admissibility of evidence of similar facts. Some of these exceptions are derivable from the dictum of Lord Herschell in Markin’s case (supra).

The continuation of the dictum is as follows:

“… on the other hand, the mere fact that the evidence adduced tends to show the commission of other offences does not render it inadmissible if it be relevant to an issue before the jury, and it may be so relevant if it bears upon the question whether the acts alleged to constitute the offence charged in the indictment were designed or accidental, or to rebut a defence which would otherwise be opened to the accused.”

As derivations of this dictum, similar facts evidence will be admissible if it is relevant to an issue before the court, to rebut a defence which would otherwise be opened to the accused, or it bears upon the question whether the acts alleged to constitute the offence charged in the indictment were designed or accidental.

Apart from the dictum of Lord Herschell, Similar facts evidence is admissible under the common law where:

(1) the fact in issue and other facts similar to it have a common origin;

(2) the fact in issue and other facts similar to it show a system or systematic course of conduct by a person;

(3) the fact in issue and other facts similar to it show identity of a person as one having abnormal propensity.

(4) Also in action for damages by domestic animals.

This exceptions shall now be considered individually.

1. Common Origin

Under this exception, similar facts evidence are admissible when the objects of evidence are derived from the same origin or process. This admissibility is based on the undeniable connection between the subject-matters.

In the case of Manchester Brewery v. Coombs 82 L.T 347 @ 349, the issue was whether the beer sold to the brewer by the publican was good. Evidence showing similar beer sold to other publicans was admissible, given that the supplies were from the same brewing.

Also, in Winkinson v. Clarke (1916) 2 KB 363, the quality of milk delivered by a dairy-man was in question. Evidence showing other deliveries made to another customer was admissible given the two deliveries were extracted from the same cows and at the same milking.

2. To Show System or Systemic Course of conduct

Similar facts evidence can also be admissible to show that the accused was engaged in actions that reveal a system. This usually arises in criminal actions. In showing a system, one criminal act done in the past by the accused is not enough. At least two former acts are needed to show a system with the present one.

In R v. Smith (1915) 11 C. A. R 279, a man was on trial for the murder of his wife. The woman was found died in her bath, shortly after the man insured her life in his favour. There have been two other past cases where the wives of the man had died after been life-insured in his favour. In showing that the accused was perpetrating a system of killing his wives for the claiming of insurance benefits after their deaths, evidence of the two former acts were allowed.

Also, in Makin v. Attorney-General, New South Wales (supra), a man and his wife were charged with the murder of their adopted child. The body of the child was found buried in the garden of the accused persons and was in such a state that the cause of death could not be ascertained. Evidence showing that other infants earlier adopted by the accused persons had also disappeared with bodies of unidentified infants found in the gardens of their former houses were held admissible to show system.

3. Prove of Identity

Evidence of Similar Facts may also be admissible when it is necessary to show that the accused is one with abnormal propensity needed for committing the offence charged.

In R v. Straffen (1952) 2 QB 911, the accused strangled the deceased to death for no apparent reason. There was no sexual assault and the body was no hidden. In determining whether the accused was the murderer, evidence showing two other girls previously killed by him in the same manner was held admissible to prove his identity as having abnormal propensity.

4. Action for damages by domestic animals

This relates to actions in Tort. In an action for damages by a domestic animal which is naturally not vicious or dangerous, evidence of past damages to the knowledge of its owner is relevant and admissible. In Lewis v. Jones 49 J. P. 198, the fact that a dog belonging to the plaintiff had killed the defendant’s sheep was held admissible to prove that other sheep of the defendant were killed by the plaintiff’s dog.

Statutory Exception to exclusion of Evidence of Similar Facts

Certain exceptions to the general rule excluding similar facts evidence in trials can be found in the Evidence Act, 2011.

1. Section 12 Evidence Act

The major exception is contained in Section 12, and others are in Sections 35 and 36.

Section 12 of the Evidence Act, 2011, provides:

“When there is a question whether an act was accidental or intentional, or done with a particular knowledge or intention or to rebut any defence that may otherwise be open to the defendant, the fact that such act formed part of a series of similar occurrences, in each of which the person doing the act was concerned, is relevant.”

This provision of the law is relevant to both criminal and civil cases. A major effect of Section 12 of the Evidence Act 2011 is that similar facts evidence is admissible to rebut any defence that may otherwise be opened to the accused.

Noticeably, this is similar to the dictum of Lord Herschell in Markin’s case (supra). This exception has therefore been in use in Nigeria, even before the enactment of the Evidence Act.

In R v. Adeniji & ors, the appellant was charged with being in possession of moulds for minting coins under Section 148(3)(c) of the then Criminal Code. The West Africa Court of Appeal (WACA) held that evidence of previous uttering of counterfeit coins by him was admissible in order to prove guilty knowledge.

2. Section 36 Evidence Act

Providing a similar exception, Section 36 of the Evidence Act, 2011, provides:

“(1) Whenever any person is being proceeded against for receiving any property, knowing it to have been stolen or for having in his possession stolen property, for the purpose of proving guilty knowledge there may be given in evidence at any stage of the proceeding –

a. the fact that other property stolen within the period of twelve months preceding the date of the offence charged was found or had been in his possession;

b. the fact that within the five years preceding the date of the offence charged he was convicted of any offence involving fraud or dishonesty.”

Therefore Similar facts evidence is admissible for proving guilty knowledge in cases of stolen property. See Okoroji v. State (2001) FWLR (Pt. 77) 871.

3. Section 35 Evidence Act

“Acts of possession and enjoyment of land may be evidence of ownership or of a right of occupancy not only of the particular piece or quantity of land with reference to which such acts are done, but also of other land so situated or connected with it by locality or similarity that what is true as to the one piece of land is likely to be true of the other piece of land.”

This section provides that acts made in ownership of a land can be used to prove ownership of a similar or connected land. It is noted that this one of the ways of proving title to land highlighted in Omonua v. Okpere (1991) 5 NWLR (Pt 186).

Conclusion

Evidence of Similar Facts is one of the exclusionary rules of evidence. As a general rule, applicable to both criminal and civil cases, it is inadmissible. However, this is subject to certain exceptions seen in common law and statutory provisions. And finally, the court has the discretionary power to disallow similar facts evidence if the prejudicial effect against the accused outweighs the probative value of the evidence.

1Applicable in the Southern region of Nigeria

2Applicable in the Northern region of Nigeria


CREDIT: Lecture note by Mr Alayinde, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL Framework, Principles, Rules etc.) – Deborah Ali

International Humanitarian Law

INTRODUCTION

The history of International Humanitarian Law (hereinafter referred to as “IHL”), dates back to the year 1859, specifically the 24th of June with the headline,The Battle of Solferino”. On that day to be remembered forever, the bloody struggle for Italian unification came to an end when the armies of France and Piedmont-Sardinia defeated Austrian forces at Solferino in northern Italy. The evolution of contemporary humanitarianism was fundamentally influenced by this historical moment.

One would wonder how the advent of humanitarianism could result from a conflict that left over 6,000 people dead and 40,000 injured. We can only respond to this issue by examining the specifics of what transpired during that conflict.

The Battle of Solferino

The Battle of Solferino was a struggle for Italian Unification. Napoleon III, the Emperor of France, led an alliance with the Sardinians against the Austrian forces in this battle. According to historians, at least 230,000 soldiers from the Franco-Sardinian and Austrian armies fought on the battlefield along a 15-kilometre frontline. It was a bloody battle that went on for more than 12 hours.

Following the battle, the French and Sardinian soldiers’ medical services were overwhelmed. There were reports of wounded and dying soldiers on both sides. There was a shortage of food and water supply, and transportation for the wounded was practically non-existent. There was no protection or treatment for the civilians and all who had suffered injuries from this battle. This horrific state led to the question of how human suffering could be limited and prevented in times of armed conflict.

This question was answered by Henry Dunant, a Swiss Businessman, who had witnessed the aftermath of the battle. He realized that there was a need for international rules which would limit the effects of war on people and property, and protect certain particularly vulnerable groups of persons. He then pushed for the creation of a neutral and impartial organization to protect and assist the wounded. This Organization is what we have come to know as the International Committee of the Red Cross (hereinafter referred to as the “ICRC”).

The ICRC quickly began its work in 1864 with a diplomatic conference, organized by the Swiss government, at the prompting of the five founding members of the ICRC. It was at this conference that the 16 states in attendance adopted the Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field. This was the birth of modern IHL.

Having succinctly discussed the historical development of IHL, we would now delve into the primary focus of this article. At the end of this article, the reader would understand the concept of IHL, the principles of IHL and why IHL was created.

What is IHL?

To begin with, it is important to note that IHL is a branch of International Law, the body of regulations that governs interactions between States. International law is contained in agreements between States; treaties or conventions; customary rules, which consist of State practise considered by them as legally binding, and general principles.

Moving further, IHL is a set of rules which seek, for humanitarian reasons, to limit the effects of armed conflict. It protects persons who are not or are no longer participating in the hostilities and restricts the means and methods of warfare. IHL is also known as the law of war or the law of armed conflict.

Legal Framework of IHL

The birth of contemporary IHL initially developed through the Law of Geneva; which protects the victims of armed conflicts such as military personnel and civilians who are not or no longer participating in hostilities, and the Law of Hague which regulates the conduct of hostilities and limits means and methods of warfare.

The inadequacies of these legal instruments were later revealed during World War II when it was discovered that nearly every letter of the Hague agreement had been broken. In this war, Civilians and Military Personnel were killed in equal numbers. Thereafter, the international community adopted a new instrument and revised existing conventions in response to the high rates of civilian casualties and the catastrophic effects the war had on people. This led to the adoption of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 still in force today.

The ICRC also pushed for additional protocols to the Geneva Convention, and this led to the adoption of additional protocols 1-4, two of which were adopted in 1977.

When Does IHL Apply?

There are specific situations and scenarios in which IHL would apply. IHL applies only to situations of armed conflict and to all actors in an armed conflict. IHL does not apply to situations of violence not reaching the threshold of armed conflict; cases of this type are governed by the provisions of human rights law and domestic regulation.

These situations have been classified into two. Namely:

  • International Armed Conflict; and
  • Non-International Armed Conflict

International armed conflict occurs every time there is a resort to armed force between two or more countries. While, Non- international armed conflict exists when there is protracted armed violence between government forces and organised armed groups or between such groups within a country.

Principles of IHL

IHL has certain fundamental principles guiding its application during Armed Conflict. The Principles of the IHL include but are not limited to:

  1. Distinction: According to this principle, parties to an armed conflict must always distinguish between civilians and combatants, as well as between civilian objects and military objectives, and only direct their actions against these targets. IHL justifies this distinction by stating that during armed conflicts, only combatants and military objectives may be targeted.
  2. Proportionality: the principle of proportionality seeks to minimise the harm caused by military operations by mandating that the results of the means and techniques of war employed must not be disproportionate to the military advantage sought.
  3. Precaution: This principle simply emphasizes the need to take care in military operations to limit the effect of armed conflict on civilians and civilian objects. It emphasizes that all feasible precautions must be taken to avoid, and in any event to minimize, incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians and damage to civilian objects.

Why Do We Need IHL?

IHL is one of the most powerful tools the international community has at its disposal to ensure the safety and dignity of people in times of war. The main objectives of IHL include:

  1. To limit the suffering caused by warfare and to alleviate its effects.
  2. To protect the sick, wounded, shipwrecked, prisoners of war and people who are deprived of their liberty.
  3. To ensure special protections for vulnerable people, including foreign nationals in the power of a party to the conflict, civilian internees, and women and children.
  4. To preserve a measure of humanity amidst conflict, with the guiding principle that even in war there are limits.

Rules Of IHL

IHL rules are the result of a delicate balance between the exigencies of warfare (” military necessity ” ) on the one hand and the laws of humanity on the other. These rules are as follows:

  1. Persons who are hors de combat (outside of combat), and those who are not taking part in hostilities or situations of armed conflict (e.g., neutral nationals), shall be protected in all circumstances.
  2. The wounded and the sick shall be cared for and protected by the party which has them in its power.
  3. The emblem of the “Red Cross”, or of the “Red Crescent,” shall be required to be respected as a sign of protection.
  4. Captured persons must be protected against acts of violence and reprisals. They shall have the right to correspond with their families and to receive relief.
  5. No one shall be subjected to torture or cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
  6. Parties to a conflict do not have an unlimited choice of methods and means of warfare.
  7. Parties to a conflict shall at all times distinguish between combatants and non-combatants.
  8. Attacks shall be directed solely against legitimate military targets .

Conclusion

Conclusively, IHL recognizes the fact that outbreaks of wars cannot always be prevented. It is also expected that harm, destruction, and death can be lawful during armed conflict. However, IHL has such principles in place in order to preserve humanity and mitigate destruction which occurs amid warfare. The principles and rules of IHL are imperative to ensure that lives are not wasted.


REFERENCES

  1. 1949 Geneva Convention (I) For The Amelioration Of The Condition Of The Wounded And Sick In Armed Forces In The Field | Centre For International Law’ (Web.archive.org) <https://web.archive.org/web/20140221161712/http://cil.nus.edu.sg/1949/1949-geneva-convention-i-for-the-amelioration-of-the-condition-of-the-wounded-and-sick-in-armed-forces-in-the-field/> accessed 9 September 2021
  2. Help H, and Law I, ‘What Is International Humanitarian Law? – Canadian Red Cross’ (Red Cross Canada, 2022) <https://www.redcross.ca/how-we-help/international-humanitarian-law/what-is-international-humanitarian-law> accessed 9 September 2021
  3. ‘International Committee Of The Red Cross’ (International Committee of the Red Cross, 2022) <http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/p0365> accessed 9 September 2021
  4. ‘Solferino And The International Committee Of The Red Cross’ (ICRC.org, 2022) <https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/resources/documents/feature/2010/solferino-feature-240609.htm&usg=AOvVaw0y3ddS-D0kKxG-mXJtIbWs> accessed 16 September 2021
  5. ‘What Is IHL’ (Icrc.org) <https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/what_is_ihl.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwj6v6-> accessed 10 September 2021
  6. ‘International Humanitarian Law’ (Wikipedia.org) <html49%en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_humanitarian_law40%> accessed 9 September 2021
  7. ‘Basics of International Humanitarian Law’ (reliefweb.int) <reliefweb.int/report/world/basics-international-hu…an-law-december-201717%brainly.in/question/1413851510%> accessed 10 September 2021

Photo Credit: Legal Desire


About Author

Deborah Ali is a third year law student at the University of Jos, Nigeria. She is passionate about International law, global development, Intellectual Property, Technology and AI. She loves reading, writing and learning new languages: Korean, French and Spanish being her top choices.

Deborah Ali

Legal Implications of Copyright Infringement in Nigeria – Deborah Ali

Legal Implications of Copyright Infringement

ABSTRACT

Creativity is at the core of human existence. It is a way of life that values originality and embraces innovation. As an important aspect of life, people are constantly coming up with fresh concepts, imaginative writing, artistic creations, and other forms of imaginative expression.

What happens when these works get stolen by those who haven’t put any effort into the creation of those works? Is there any legal protection available to these authors and to their works? This article will provide an answer to these questions.

By the end of this article, the reader would understand the meaning of Copyright and its statutory provisions, the concept of Copyright Infringement and the remedies available for Copyright Infringement.

Introduction

These fresh concepts, writings, artistic creations are regarded as Intellectual Property which pertains to any original creation of the human intellect. Copyright is a branch of Intellectual Property which affords the Creative exclusive rights over their literary, musical or artistic work to prevent unauthorized or unaccredited use of their work and preserve the value of those works.

Legal Framework of Copyright in Nigeria

To begin, it is necessary to clearly define Copyright before examining the legal framework of Copyright in Nigeria.

Copyright is defined by the 10th edition of the Black’s Law Dictionary at Page 411, as a property right in an original work of authorship (including literary, musical, dramatic, choreographic, pictorial, graphic, sculptural, and architectural works; motion pictures and other audio-visual works; and sound recordings) fixed in any tangible medium of expression, giving the holder exclusive right to reproduce, adapt, distribute, perform, and display the work.

The principal legislation regulating Copyright in Nigeria is the Nigerian Copyright Act of 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Copyright Act’). The Copyright Act established the Nigerian Copyright Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the NCC’) as an independent regulatory authority responsible for the administration of Copyright in Nigeria1.

The aforementioned leads us to the logical conclusion that copyright is significant and has legal backing in Nigeria.

Additionally, copyright protection is acknowledged internationally. Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides that “Everyone has a right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.”

How Does Copyright Work?

The copyright of a work is vested in the author2. In the case of joint authorship, where the contribution of one author is inseparable from that of another, both or all authors involved shall be co-owners of the copyright. However, in the case of a work by an employee made as commissioned in the course of their employment, the copyright shall belong to the proprietor, unless otherwise provided by an agreement.

Additionally, it is common knowledge that excessive freedom gives room for abuse. As much as it is necessary to preserve and protect the works of people, it is also necessary to state the situations in which Copyright is made available to Authors/Creatives.

Copyright begins when an author places his or her work in material form, such as when a writer places the work on a piece of paper, a painter puts paint on a canvas, or a composer records a musical work on tape. There is no copyright in an idea. If the idea, however brilliant and however clever it may be, is nothing more than an idea, and is not put into any form of words, or any form of expression such as s picture or a play, then there is no such thing as copyright at all3.

However, not every work is eligible for Copyright. Section 1, 26 and 31 of the Copyright Act provides for the works that are eligible for Copyright as follows:

  1. Literary works;
  2. Musical works;
  3. Artistic works;
  4. Cinematography works;
  5. Sound recording;
  6. Broadcasts;
  7. Performer rights; and
  8. Expression of Folklore

Registration Of Copyright

In Nigeria, any work eligible for Copyright right is protected without any formalities or requirement of registration, provided that the work has fulfilled the requirements of originality fixation and a definite medium of expression4. However, a copyright owner may voluntarily register and deposit his work at the Nigerian Copyright Commission (NCC) under its copyright notification scheme.

The duration of Copyright for the eligible works is stated under the First Schedule to the Copyright Act. For literary, musical and artistic works, copyright subsist from when the work is made still seventy (70) years after the end of the year in which the author(s) dies. For cinematography films, photographs, and sound recordings, copyright shall subsist from when the work was made till fifty (50) years after the end of the year in which it was first published. Finally, copyright shall subsist in a broadcast still after fifty (50) years after the end of the year in which the broadcast first took place.

Copyright Infringement

Copyright Infringement is defined by the 10th edition of the Black’s law dictionary at Page 901 as the act of violating any of a copyright owner’s exclusive rights. Any unauthorized use of a work protected by a copyright, whether through reproduction, distribution, mutilation, or public performance, constitutes a Copyright Infringement Section 15 of the Copyright act provides specifically for instances where Copyright Infringement occur5.

Action/ Remedies for Copyright Infringement

The Copyright Act provides that an action for infringement of Copyright should be instituted at the Federal High Court exercising jurisdiction in the place where the infringement occurred.

It should be noted that where in any action for infringement, it is proved that an infringement was committed, but at the time of the infringement, the defendant was not aware, and had no reasonable grounds for suspecting that the copyright existed in the work to which the action relates, the plaintiff will not be entitled to any damages against the defendant in respect of the infringement, but shall be entitled to an action of profits in respect of the infringement, whether or not any other relief is granted6. However, it is incumbent on anyone who proposes to make use of any artistic work which might infringe copyright, if it subsisted in the work, to make such inquiries and investigation as he reasonably can to satisfy himself that the work is free of copyright7.

Ultimately, where a case of Copyright Infringement has been established the remedies available can be civil or criminal; or both.

  • Civil Remedies

A person whose copyright has been infringed can initiate a civil action at the Federal High Court8. Where such action is successful, the court can award: an award of damages; orders of injunction; or order for account. Additionally, the copyright owner will be entitled to all copies of the infringing materials the court may find9.

  • Criminal Liability

Section 20 of the Copyright Act provides for the three categories of criminal liability for copyright infringement. In this case, the onus of proof of innocence is cast on the accused person. Section 30(1) of the Copyright act provides for the punishment of a fine or imprisonment to any person found guilty of Copyright Infringement.

Notably, a civil and criminal action may run simultaneously on the same fact of infringement, and the criminal action may subsist even if the parties had settled the civil claim.

Conclusion

There are numerous laws in place to protect copyright owners against infringement. However, the government and non-governmental organizations/bodies must actively counteract this crime by enforcing strict adherence to the law and working hard to protect the rights of copyright owners.


REFERENCES

  1. Dugeri M, Entertainment Law in Nigeria (Adcore Consulting 2021) 40
  1. Omaplex, “THE CONCEPT OF COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND REMEDIES AVAILABLE – Omaplex Law Firm” (Omaplex Law Firm, July 1, 2020) <https://omaplex.com.ng/the-concept-of-copyright-infringement-and-remedies-available/> accessed October 2022
  2. “Identification And Proof Of Copyright Infringement In Copyrighted Works – Copyright – Nigeria” (June 24, 2021) <https://www.mondaq.com/nigeria/copyright/1084288/identification-and-proof-of-copyright-infringement-in-copyrighted-works> accessed October 2022
  3. “An Introduction to Copyright Protection in Nigeria – Inioluwa Olaposi – LawGlobal Hub” (LawGlobal Hub, June 5, 2022) <https://www.lawglobalhub.com/copyright-protection-in-nigeria/> accessed October 2022
  4. “Legal Remedies for Copyright Infringement in Nigeria – Lexology” (Lexology) <https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ffc42333-ac14-4fd8-8c08-a05a9ffc4c4e#:~:text=A%20Copyright%20is%20infringed%20where,the%20owner%20of%20the%20copyright.> accessed October 2022
  5. Chioma U, “Copyright Infringement: An Overview Of Music Plagiarism In Nigeria – TheNigeriaLawyer” (TheNigeriaLawyer, March 20, 2022) <https://thenigerialawyer.com/copyright-infringement-an-overview-of-music-plagiarism-in-nigeria/> accessed October 2022

1Section 34(1) of the Copyright Act.

2Section 10(1) of the Copyright Act.

3 See DONOGHUE V. ALLIED NEWSPAPERS LTD (1937) 3 ALL ER 503

4Section 1(2) of the Copyright Act.

5See DIGITAL COMMUNICATION NETWORK (NIG) LTD V. NCC (2013) LPELR- 20797 (CA)

6Section 29(2) of the Copyright act.

7See Infabrics LTD v. Jaytex LTD (1980) 2 All ER 669.

8Section 24 of the Copyright Act

9Section 16 and 18 of the Copyright Act


About Author

Deborah Ali is a third year law student at the University of Jos, Nigeria. She is passionate about International law, global development, Intellectual Property, Technology and AI. She loves reading, writing and learning new languages: Korean, French and Spanish being her top choices.

Collegium System and its war with the Central Government – Kumar & Bhan

Collegium System and its war with the Central Government

“No institution in ‘democracy’ is perfect” -CJI DY Chandrachud

The Collegium system is the most debatable topic from the time of its origin. This system has emerged from the various judicial pronouncements of the Supreme Court.

A huge amount of criticism has been faced by the collegium system from the government and the society because of its negative aspects like obscurity and favouritism. Due to these issues, the debate has arisen again by the Central government.

Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju has written to the Chief Justice of India, that he is not satisfied with the current system of appointing judges aka Collegium System, and has proposed the reintroduction of the National Judicial Appointment Commission (NJAC) and also suggested that the collegium should have at least one government nominee.

What is the collegium system?

The collegium system is a system which deals with the appointment and transfer of the judges of the different courts of India including the Chief Justice of India. It has not been developed by any Act or any provision of the constitution but it owes its origin to the various judgements.

The Present Collegium system comprises 5 judges including 4 Senior-Most Judges of the Supreme Court of India headed by the Chief Justice of India, similarly, Judges of High Courts are also appointed by a group of three Judges which is lead by the Chief Justice of India and other two senior-most judges of the respective High Courts.

Article 124(2) and Article 217 of the Indian constitution lay down that the Judges of the Supreme Court and High Court shall be appointed by the President of India after consultation with judges of the Supreme Court for the former and with the consultation of the Chief Justice of India, the Governor of the state for the latter.

Therefore, power has been Conferred in the hands of these people for the transfer and appointment of the Judges and the role of the government is only to choose those persons who are named by the collegium.

Origin and Journey of the collegium system:

Over time, the procedure of appointment has faced many changes and has transformed from being an executive function which has to be accomplished by the president to being a judicial function which is being exercised by the Chief Justice of India, and the role of the President has become no more than an approver.

The existence of the collegium system is itself an irony because it replaces a body established by the parliament(NJAC) based on it being unconstitutional while being unconstitutional itself.

Till the year 1973, there was a mutual agreement between the government and the Chief justice of India which led to the formation of the convention where it has been agreed that the chief justice of India will be the senior most judge of the Supreme Court but, in 1973, this convention was violated when A.N.Ray was appointed as the Chief Justice of India after superseding three other senior judges of the Supreme Court to him.

This incident saw its repetition in 1977. In this way, the clash between the executive and judiciary regarding the appointment of judges came into existence. Article 124(2) and 217 of the Indian Constitution states that The President shall appoint the judges after consulting with the judges of the Supreme Court and High Court whichever may be necessary but our Constitution is silent about the word “Consultation”. Such matter was later on decided in the following catena of judgements.

S.P. Gupta v Union of India (1981) (“First Judges’ Case”)
In 1981, the collegium system was surrounded by debates when the then law minister, Shiv Shankar filed a petition regarding the implementation of a policy for posting judges out of their home states.

While dealing with the several petitions, the court also shed some light on the power to appoint High Court and Supreme Court Judges and held that the Chief Justice of India and Chief Justice of the High court can only consult and only the executive can exercise the power of appointment.

Justice Bhagwati held that the word consultation does not mean concurrence. The decision of the Supreme Court Judges is not binding on the President in the matter of Appointment and transfer.

Supreme Court Advocate-on-Record Association vs Union of India (1993) (“Second Judges’ Case”)
The Supreme Court overruled its previous judgement in the S.P. Gupta case and held that the word “consultation” implies “concurrence” which means that the Chief Justice of India has the superiority over the President and his power is regarded as “unique, singular and primal”.

Further Supreme court stated that the decision of the Chief Justice of India is not solely his own but is of the collegium which consists of the CJI and Two other Senior Judges.

Re Presidential Reference (1998) (“Third Judges’ Case”)
In this case, 9 judge bench of the Supreme Court opined that the decision of the Chief justice of India has primacy and the collegium should consist of CJI along with 4 other senior-most Judges of the Supreme court which was earlier two in number.

In 2014 Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) came to power and passed the National Judicial Appointment Commission Act. The composition of NJAC consisted of the CJI, 2 Senior-most judges of the Supreme Court, The Law Minister of India, and 2 eminent members that were chosen by the selection committee(the CJI, P.M., the leader of the opposition). Power has been given to the NJAC for recommending the names for the appointment of judges of the Supreme court and the Transfer and appointment of the judges of the high court.

The constitutionality of NJAC was challenged in the case of Supreme Court Advocate-on-Record Association vs Union of India (2015) andthe Majority of the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional and violative of the Basic Structure doctrine of the Indian Constitution and also found it to be against the independence of the judiciary.

Hence in this way, the Present collegium system has evolved in which the President is obliged to consider the opinion of the Chief Justice of India and the opinion must be made after due Consultation with the Judges in the Collegium.

Should collegium be quashed?

The constitutional validity of the Collegium System is no doubt a big question and has been answered mostly negatively.

Late V.R. Krishna Iyer says regarding the nature of collegium:

Thus, today we have a curious creation with no backing under the Constitution, except a ruling of the Supreme Court, and that too based on a very thin majority in a single ruling. Today, the collegium on its own makes the selection. There is no particular structure to hear the public in the process of selection. No principle is laid down, no investigation is made, and a sort of anarchy prevails. In a minimal sense, the selection of judges of the highest court is done in an unprincipled manner, without investigation or study of the class character by the members of the collegium. There has been criticism of the judges so selected, but the collegium is not answerable to anyone.”

While reading Article 124(2) we often ignore the fact that the article and its application do not match and render the collegium unconstitutional. The article clearly says that:

Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such of the Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary for the purpose.

Meaning, even if the collegium system is ignorant of the constitutional scheme accommodating a body for the appointment of judges, the membership of this very body must be verified and validated by the President of India.

The criticism of the collegium mainly revolves around the following grounds:

  • Transparency: Due to the absence of any criteria-based assessment and any information available regarding the working of the collegium system, makes it less reliable and credible.
  • Unconstitutional: In the Constitution, the word “collegium” is mentioned nowhere, and has been created by the judiciary for reserving the power to select judges.
  • Undemocratic: There is no role of the public in the selection of judges, and consequently the judges are not accountable to the people.
  • Nepotism: Many judges are appointed based on their relations with senior lawyers in the higher judiciary.

Putting aside all the criticism, the Supreme court still maintains that the collegium system is the most transparent body and it should neither be quashed nor replaced. Former Chief Justice UU Lalit also said that the collegium system will stay here unless the government revives the National Judicial Appointment Commission.


Image Credit: Telegraph India


About the Authors

Aditya Kumar Saraswat and Aman Bhan Pachauri are third year Students of the Faculty of Law, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.

The Role Of The Nigerian Lawyer In The Metaverse – Ani Freedolyn Chinechere

Role Of The Nigerian Lawyer In The Metaverse

ABSTRACT

Technology, instead of diminishing the legal profession, actually reinforces it and makes lawyers more germane amid expeditiously changing times. The impact of technology on the legal world is indisputable, especially given the context of the Metaverse.

The metaverse which is considered the next horizon of a digitalized world is the conglomeration of cyberspace and physical reality. It aims to give a far more immersive experience to individuals through an alternative reality that may soon become integrated with their everyday lives just like the internet.

Although the Metaverse is still constantly being developed, it is predicted that the Metaverse could accommodate nearly every kind of lawful or unlawful human activity and as a result, give rise to the emergence of an array of novel legal issues that will need to be addressed by lawyers. It is pertinent to note that Nigerian lawyers are not exempted from this call of duty as the Metaverse will impact the Nigerian legal space. It becomes important for Nigerian lawyers to understand the whole concept of the Metaverse and their roles in the Metaverse to enable them to address these legal issues whenever they arise.

Keywords: Metaverse, Non-fungible token (NFT), Smart Contract, Block-Chain, Avatar, Technology, Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality, Mixed Reality, Nigerian Lawyer

Definition of words

Non-Fungible Token (NFT)

Non-fungible tokens often referred to as NFTs, are blockchain-based tokens that each represent a unique asset like a piece of art, digital content, or media1. An NFT can be thought of as an irrevocable digital certificate of ownership and authenticity for a given asset, whether digital or physical2

Smart Contract

Smart contracts are simply programs stored on a blockchain that run when predetermined conditions are met3. They typically are used to automate the execution of an agreement so that all participants can be immediately certain of the outcome, without any intermediary’s involvement or time loss4.

Block Chain

A blockchain is a digital ledger or database where encrypted blocks of digital asset data are stored and chained together, forming a chronological single-source-of-truth for the data5.

Avatar

According to the Cambridge dictionary, an avatar is an image that represents one in online games, chat rooms, e.t.c and that one can move around the screen.

Introduction

The Metaverse is an emerging cyberspace realm where people and entities (and various forms of algorithms and artificial intelligence) will interact , engage in games , sports, and entertainment , buy and sell “real world” and “in the Metaverse” goods and services, and otherwise get into legal disputes just like IRL (in Real Life) persons and entities6. As the Metaverse evolves and expands, so too will the number of legal and regulatory issues which will arise that lawyers must help their clients navigate7. A profound understanding of the concept of the Metaverse and the role of lawyers in the Metaverse will enable lawyers with reference to Nigerian lawyers, to properly address these legal and regulatory issues.

This essay focuses on the Conceptual analysis of the Metaverse and how it works, Possible legal issues that may arise in the Metaverse and the Role of a Nigerian lawyer in the Metaverse.

What is the Metaverse and How Does It Work?

The term “Metaverse”, a combination of the prefix “meta” ( beyond) and “universe”, is commonly used to describe communal and interactive cyberspace where content , commerce and networking exist with increasing permeability to the real world8.

Metaverse was created in 1992 by Neal Stephenson and is based on blockchain technology, using digital assets called “Smart Contracts”9. These Smart Contracts are stored on the blockchain and can be used in other virtual worlds and the real world10.

It is a shared virtual-reality space where people can interact with the digital world and engage with one another through custom avatars11.As Matthew Ball, the former head of content at Amazon, stated, “The metaverse is a persistent, synchronous and live universe that spans both the digital and physical worlds with total inclusion”.12 As a result, users can buy and sell products, assets and real estate using cryptocurrency, attend various events and business meetings, play games, and socialize with others just like in the physical world13. What makes transactions carried out on Metaverse more real is the fact that ownership of a 100% virtual good can be proven and has authority via code on an immutable ledger14. In simpler words, a person is able to purchase land, a house, a car, or any other assets using a Non-Fungible Token (NFT) on a virtual platform and prove them to be their own15.

While the metaverse can take numerous forms, Presence and Interoperability are two fundamental features16. The first and most important factor is Presence, which refers to the sensation of actually being in a virtual world with others17. Decades of research have demonstrated that having a sense of embodiment — which may be obtained with virtual reality technologies like head-mounted displays, increases the quality of online interactions.18

Second, interoperability refers to the capacity to move freely across virtual places while using the same virtual assets, such as avatars and digital objects19. For example, ReadyPlayerMe allows users to build an avatar that they can utilize in a variety of virtual worlds, including Zoom meetings via apps like Animaze20. At the same time, blockchain-based technologies like cryptocurrencies and non-fungible tokens can make it easier to move digital assets across virtual borders21.

The Metaverse has three (3) dimensions; Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR) and Mixed Reality (MR). For VR, one is transported into the virtual space via hardware devices like the VR headset22. In AR, the virtual space or content is projected into one’s physical environment. It overlays visual elements, sounds and other sensory input into real world settings to enhance the user experience while XR is a combination of both23.

It is pertinent to note that the Metaverse and the internet do not mean the same thing. The Metaverse is not the same as the internet neither does it compete with it—it builds on it24. In the Metaverse, users traverse a virtual world that mimics aspects of the physical world using technologies such as virtual reality (VR), AR, AI, social media and digital currencies while the internet is a worldwide system of computer networks25.

What Legal Issues May Arise in the Metaverse?

As with any groundbreaking technological development, the Metaverse will raise novel and complex legal issues26. As the practical applications of the Metaverse continue to broaden and evolve with improvements in technology, so too will the legal and regulatory challenges27. It must be noted that the metaverse as it stands is currently under-regulated, which could pose a problem for clients if they want to start investing in the companies that are running it and the digital assets it produces28.

Any Nigerian lawyer looking to participate in Metaverse should consider the laws in the following areas and determine possible regulatory parameters instead of waiting for these issues to emerge before doing so;

Intellectual Property Rights (IP)

Intellectual property law preserves the right of creators against their inventions, trademarks, or other creations29. The use of virtual images and virtual performances may lead to concerns over the use of image rights and copyright, and dealing with different approaches in different jurisdictions30.

An important aspect of the virtual landscape that a Nigerian lawyer should take cognizance of as it relates to Intellectual Property is Trademark. A trademark is a word, phrase, slogan, design, or logo that acts as a source indicator for goods or services.31 Trademark law protects against unauthorized third-party use of a trademark, in a way that would lead a reasonable consumer to believe that the trademark owner was either the source of the goods/services, endorsed, or sponsored such goods/services, or in a way that would dilute the trademark32. While mixed and augmented reality has allowed brands to reach out to developing new industries and consumer base, it has also generated challenges for trademark owners and users, particularly in the gaming industry.33

Brands have filed trademark dilution and infringement cases involving metaverse goods and services34. For example, Hermes sued Mason Rothschild for trademark infringement for his creation and sale of “Metabirkins,” NFTs attached to digital images depicting bags resembling Hermes’ Birkin bags35. The case is still pending in the Southern District of New York36.

Among the questions a Nigerian lawyer should endeavour to seek an answer to is , “Can a company take legal action against users who infringe their intellectual property rights in the metaverse?37 A Nigerian lawyer will need to assist in identifying IP rights that will be appropriate in the Metaverse and ensure appropriate consents and licenses are put in place.

In the same vein, it is suggested that a Nigerian lawyer venturing into the metaverse should also take cognizance of copyright risks and patent risks. A copyright is a legal protection given to the creators or originators of creative expressions, whether they are literary, musical, artistic, or cinematographic works, or adaptations of any of these works38. It gives the creator of the work an exclusive and assignable right, that while exclusive to the author, is subject to the recognized legal rights of others39. It is not enough for an idea or concept to be created in the mind of the creator; it must also be expressed or fixed in some media, such as paper, diskettes, flash drives, CD-Rom, VCD, DVD, and so on, in order to be protected40.

A patent is a government authority or licence conferring an exclusive right or title for a set period, especially the sole right to exclude others from making, using, or selling an invention in the country it is obtained without permission or consent during the lifespan of the patent41. Patent use in the metaverse, like other intellectual property, presents both opportunities and risks.42

Data Security and Privacy

Digital security and privacy will be among the most significant legal issues facing platform owners43. It is pertinent to note that data in the metaverse will become exponentially more valuable than it already is, and technologies will become increasingly integrated into multiple aspects of users’ lives44. This developing technology will stress-test existing laws and put even greater pressure on regulators to match the sophistication of the technology45.

Most countries in the European Union (EU) are benefitting from relatively effective, though rather restricting data privacy laws and regulations46. Unfortunately, Nigeria is still lagging. That said, the metaverse environment has no national or geographic boundaries47. Users from Nigeria and certain countries may not be as protected as the countries in the European Union (EU)48. How will the companies in the Metaverse communicate these differences? How will they deal with international law and regulations? 49 . This must be critically examined.

Behaviour in the metaverse can reveal extensive information about people’s interests, behaviours, and even biometric data that otherwise would not be available50. This raises concerns about what data companies can collect, who owns it and how it can be used51. Existing privacy and consumer protection laws may not adequately address these issues and data collection in the metaverse raises jurisdictional questions that make it difficult to know which data protection laws apply52. A Nigerian lawyer who wants to venture into Metaverse will need to reevaluate consent and data protection mechanisms to minimize risks associated with improper data collection of his prospective clients.

Criminal Law

There have already been allegations of criminal acts in the metaverse, including crimes associated with the physical body such as sexual harassment, assault and even rape, among others53. Meta (formerly known as Facebook) responded by adding a safety feature to its Horizons World metaverse that prevents an avatar from coming within a certain proximity of another’s avatar54.

The metaverse environment will extrapolate the issues and challenges that exist in real life. As a result, crimes such as impersonation, obtaining by false pretences, cyberbullying and other cyber crimes are likely to ensue. It is probable that the greater human interaction in the metaverse will lead to crimes, requiring a redefinition of some crimes and new ideas about the prosecution of metaverse criminal activity55.

Insurance and Contractual Agreements

Due to the complex and novel issues that may arise in these areas, it is suggested these areas be scrutinized. For instance: “Can avatars enter a legally binding contract?” “Can an avatar be insured?” “Can the real person be held responsible for the actions of their avatar?”56 “How will contracts be designed and executed?”57. Lawyers will need to start thinking of possible answers to these questions instead waiting for these issues to emerge before proffering solutions to them.

The Role of a Nigerian Lawyer in the Metaverse

The Metaverse is an exciting space that presents many business opportunities and a fundamental shift in the economy58. But it also poses a challenge for lawyers in that one can not necessarily apply traditional methods of legal thinking, frameworks and regulations that have existed for hundreds of years in this new environment59. In line with this, a Nigerian lawyer venturing into the metaverse is required to be “forward-looking” with the sole responsibility of mitigating and guarding against potential liabilities and risks of his clients within the metaverse platform.

As novel legal, regulatory and technical problems emerge within the metaverse, lawyers are responsible for figuring out how existing regulations will apply to the platform and ensuring that developers, tech companies, and avatars work within the ecosystem and prioritize privacy in products60. A Nigerian lawyer needs to be able to understand these technologies and anticipate the potential problems their clients may have and help to implement mitigation strategies.

A Nigerian lawyer venturing into the metaverse may need to figure out potential employment issues within the metaverse. It is unclear how employment law would work within the metaverse61. For instance, “could avatars have distinct employment rights?”62 Having a good business and technical understanding of the product or activity operating within the metaverse is a starting point to understanding how to analyze and understand the legal issues flowing from the metaverse.63

The Metaverse will extrapolate all the problems, issues, benefits, and challenges we have currently in real life64. The exact complexities of the metaverse are unforeseeable, but having the growth mindset as a lawyer and not a very outdated perspective on legal issues, risks and limitations are crucial65.

The role of a Nigerian lawyer—mitigating and guarding against potential liabilities and risks cuts across but is not limited to the following;

  • Proffering legal advice to companies that want to purchase digital real estate assets on Decentraland or develop their digital branding presence66.
  • Drafting of contractual agreements and “Smart contracts” between parties.
  • Determination of which jurisdiction or country’s law applies to a client’s activity on metaverse.
  • Helping clients to capitalize on opportunities in the Metaverse.
  • Protection and enforcement of the Intellectual Property rights of clients.
  • Institution of defamation lawsuits and other lawsuits for clients.
  • Keeping a close tab on the client’s account(s) on metaverse through user activity monitoring software to prevent fraudulent activities on the account(s)67.
  • Mediation of disputes between parties
  • Exercise due diligence on virtual land or business purchases in the Metaverse.

Conclusion

The unfolding of the metaverse will bring along with it several business opportunities and novel legal issues bordering on Intellectual property rights, Data Security and Privacy, among others. As these novel legal and regulatory problems emerge within the metaverse, lawyers are responsible for figuring out how existing laws and regulations will apply to the platform68. In February this year, ArentFox Schiff announced that it had become the first major US law firm to “join the Metaverse” by acquiring a land site in Decentraland, a fact that underscored how seriously lawyers are taking one of the latest technology trends69.

While the metaverse holds great promise for merchants and investors alike, without a system for design, promulgation, and enforcement of rules, it could be dangerous70. Critical scrutiny of the Nigerian legal system reveals that applying the various existing provisions of the law under the Nigerian legal system in the Metaverse environment could be frustrating.

For instance, Sections 1 and 2 of the Land Use Act 1978 vest ownership, administration and control of all lands in a state on the Governor of the state with no provision for Virtual lands or its ownership71. Also, none of the laws in Nigeria makes any provision(s) for Avatar because this reality had not been contemplated at the time of drafting the various laws in operation today. Thus, how can a Nigerian lawyer determine how an avatar may be made liable for action in the metaverse when there are no corresponding laws dealing with that and what court has the jurisdiction over disputes that may ensue in the metaverse? There is an urgent need for regulators to be abreast with the reality of virtual real estate, and other issues and enact relevant laws to govern them.72

Also, The Labour Act 2004 makes no provision for the digital world of work as it exists in the metaverse73. There is therefore a need for such situations to be contemplated and necessary reviews made to fit the reality of today’s digital world of work74.

If the metaverse will deliver on the promises of the benefits it proffers , a commensurate apt legal response to the possible novel legal issues is required75 to enable lawyers effectively tackle them whenever they arise.

Recommendation

To enable Nigerian lawyers effectively accomplish their roles and responsibilities within the Metaverse whenever the need arises, the following are recommended;

  • Laws and Regulations should be enacted to combat possible novel legal issues that may emerge within the metaverse. Existing laws and regulations should also be amended to accommodate these possible legal issues. For instance, The Nigerian Data Protection Bill 2020 and other germane data and privacy regulations should be amended. Applying old provisions of the law to new technology like the Metaverse can be likened to trying to put a square peg into a round hole.
  • The government should properly monitor and regulate the sale and ownership of virtual real estate in the metaverse76.
  • Legal professionals in Nigeria need to adapt to offer a broader range of expertise to clients. The way to do this is to redefine the services that they offer by applying legal knowledge within modern contexts and advancing their technological abilities.77
  • Laudable Investments in research and formulation of effective policies by the Government
  • Sensitization and education of Lawyers and Law students on what the Metaverse is and the role of a lawyer in the metaverse. This is important as this will help them to understand, prepare and anticipate potential problems that may emerge within the metaverse and proffer solutions to them.
  • Lawyers and law students should have a good understanding of Technology law {Tech law).

1 “Non-Fungible Tokens Explained. https://aws.amazon.com/blockchain/nfts-explained/

2 “Non-Fungible Tokens Explained. https://aws.amazon.com/blockchain/nfts-explained/

3 :”What are Smart Contracts on Blockchain?”. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/topics/smart-contracts

4 :”What are Smart Contracts on Blockchain?”. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/topics/smart-contracts

5 “What is Blockchain Technology?”. Retrieved from https://builtin.com/blockchain

6Michael D. Murray, “Ready Lawyer One: Lawyering in the Metaverse” (2021). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359931632_Ready_Lawyer_One_Lawyering_in_the_Metaverse

7 Tom.k. Ara, Mark F. Radcliffe, Michael Fluhr, Katherine Imp , “Exploring the Metaverse: What laws will apply?” (2022). https://www.dlapiper.com/en/us/insights/publications/2022/06/exploring-the-metaverse-ipt-news-june-2022/

8 Reed Smith ,Guide to the Metaverse (2021) . https://www.reedsmith.com/-/media/files/perspectives/2021/metaversewhitepapperv2.pdf

9 Olga V. Mack , “What Laws Apply in Metaverse? “ (2022). https://abovethelaw.com/legal-innovation-center/2022/04/18/what-laws-apply-in-metaverse/

10 Olga V. Mack ,“What Laws Apply in Metaverse?” (2022)https://abovethelaw.com/legal-innovation-center/2022/04/18/what-laws-apply-in-metaverse/

11Jovan, “What is the Metaverse, and How Does it Work?” . https://kommandotech.com/guides/what-is-metaverse/

12 Louis Lehot, “Looking in the Future of a Legal Metaverse.” (2021)

13 Jovan, “What is the Metaverse, and How Does it Work? “ (2021). Retrieved from https://kommandotech.com/guides/what-is-metaverse/

14 Alex Siryi , “A Role and Place for Lawyers in a Metaverse Explained” (2022). https://catware.io/blog/a-role-and-place-for-lawyers-in-a-metaverse-explained/

15 Alex Siryi , “A Role and Place for Lawyers in a Metaverse Explained”. (2022). https://catware.io/blog/a-role-and-place-for-lawyers-in-a-metaverse-explained/

16 Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN, FCIArb, “What is the Metaverse? Coming to Terms With Its Legal Implications” (2022). Retrieved from https://thelawyer.ng/what-is-the-metaverse-coming-to-terms-with-its-legal-implications/

17 “Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN, FCIArb, “What is the Metaverse? Coming to Terms With Its Legal Implications. (2022) . Retrieved from https://thelawyer.ng/what-is-the-metaverse-coming-to-terms-with-its-legal-implications/

18 Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN, FCIArb, “What is the Metaverse? Coming to Terms With Its Legal Implications. (2022). Retrieved from https://thelawyer.ng/what-is-the-metaverse-coming-to-terms-with-its-legal-implications/

19 Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN, FCIArb, “What is the Metaverse? Coming to Terms With Its Legal Implications. (2022) . Retrieved from https://thelawyer.ng/what-is-the-metaverse-coming-to-terms-with-its-legal-implications/

20 Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN, FCIArb, “What is the Metaverse? Coming to Terms With Its Legal Implications. (2022). Retrieved from https://thelawyer.ng/what-is-the-metaverse-coming-to-terms-with-its-legal-implications/

21 “ What is the Metaverse? Coming to Terms With Its Legal Implications. (2022).

22 Kenneth Downs, “ What is the Metaverse and How Does it Work?’ (2021). https://blog.servermania.com/what-is-metaverse/

23 Kenneth Downs , “What is the Metaverse and How Does it Work?’ (2021). https://blog.servermania.com/what-is-metaverse/

24 Jovan, “What is the Metaverse, and How Does it Work? “ (2021). https://kommandotech.com/guides/what-is-metaverse/

25 Jovan, “What is the Metaverse, and How Does it Work?” (2021). https://kommandotech.com/guides/what-is-metaverse/

26Clifford Chance, “The Metaverse: What Are The Legal Implications?” (2022). https://www.cliffordchance.com

27 Clifford Chance , “The Metaverse: What Are The Legal Implications? (2022). Retrieved from https://www.cliffordchance.com

28 Charlotte Lear, “What’s the Metaverse and why do Lawyers care? “(2022).

29 Charlotte Lear, “What Laws Govern the Metaverse?”. Retrieved from https://www.dlapiper.com

30 James Lyon, “Legal Issues Facing the Metaverse” (2022). https://www.lawrencestephens.com/legal-issues-facing-the-metaverse/

31 Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN, FCIArb, “What is the Metaverse? Coming to Terms With Its Legal Implications” (2022). Retrieved from https://thelawyer.ng/what-is-the-metaverse-coming-to-terms-with-its-legal-implications/

32 Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN, FCIArb, “What is the Metaverse? Coming to Terms With Its Legal Implications” (2022). Retrieved from https://thelawyer.ng/what-is-the-metaverse-coming-to-terms-with-its-legal-implications/

33 Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN, FCIArb, “What is the Metaverse? Coming to Terms With Its Legal Implications” (2022). Retrieved from https://thelawyer.ng/what-is-the-metaverse-coming-to-terms-with-its-legal-implications/

34Siddartha Rao and Ellie Sanders, “What is the Metaverse and What Legal Issues Does It Raise?” (2022).Retrieved from https://www.romanolaw.com

35Siddartha Rao and Ellie Sanders, “What is the Metaverse and What Legal Issues Does It Raise? “ (2022). Retrieved from https://www.romanolaw.com

36Siddartha Rao and Ellie Sanders “What is the Metaverse and What Legal Issues Does It Raise?” (2022). Retrieved from https://www.romanolaw.com

37“ The Metaverse and its Legal Issues”. Retrieved from https://www.richardweechambers.com/the-metaverse-and-its-legal-issues/

38 Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN, FCIArb, “What is the Metaverse? Coming to Terms With Its Legal Implications” (2022). Retrieved from https://thelawyer.ng/what-is-the-metaverse-coming-to-terms-with-its-legal-implications/

39 Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN, FCIArb, “What is the Metaverse? Coming to Terms With Its Legal Implications” (2022). Retrieved from https://thelawyer.ng/what-is-the-metaverse-coming-to-terms-with-its-legal-implications/

40 Sandra Eke, “Fundamental Elements of Copyright Ownership And Protection Under Nigerian Law” (2019). https://www.mondaq.com/nigeria/copyright/866284/fundamental-elements-of-copyright-ownership-and-protection-under-nigerian-law-sandra-eke

41 Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN, FCIArb, “What is the Metaverse? Coming to Terms With Its Legal Implications” (2022). Retrieved from https://thelawyer.ng/what-is-the-metaverse-coming-to-terms-with-its-legal-implications/

42 Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi, SAN, FCIArb, “What is the Metaverse? Coming to Terms With Its Legal Implications” (2022). Retrieved from https://thelawyer.ng/what-is-the-metaverse-coming-to-terms-with-its-legal-implications/

43 Clifford Chance, “The Metaverse : What Are The Legal Implications?“ (2021). Retrieved from https://www.cliffordchance.com

44 Clifford Chance, “The Metaverse : What Are The Legal Implications? “(2021).Retrieved from https://www.cliffordchance.com

45 Clifford Chance,“The Metaverse : What Are The Legal Implications? “ (2021). Retrieved from https://www.cliffordchance.com

46 Alex Siryi , “A Role and Place for Lawyers in a Metaverse Explained” (2022). https://catware.io/blog/a-role-and-place-for-lawyers-in-a-metaverse-explained/

47 Alex Siryi , “A Role and Place for Lawyers in a Metaverse Explained” (2022).https://catware.io/blog/a-role-and-place-for-lawyers-in-a-metaverse-explained/

48 Alex Siryi “A Role and Place for Lawyers in a Metaverse Explained”,(2022). https://catware.io/blog/a-role-and-place-for-lawyers-in-a-metaverse-explained/

49 Alex Siryi “A Role and Place for Lawyers in a Metaverse Explained” (2022). https://catware.io/blog/a-role-and-place-for-lawyers-in-a-metaverse-explained/

50 Siddartha Rao and Ellie Sanders , “What is the Metaverse and What Legal Issues Does It Raise? “ (2021). Retrieved from https://www.romanolaw.com

51Siddartha Rao and Ellie Sanders, “What is the Metaverse and What Legal Issues Does It Raise? “. Retrieved from https://www.romanolaw.com

52Siddartha Rao and Ellie Sanders, “What is the Metaverse and What Legal Issues Does It Raise? “(2021). Retrieved from https://www.romanolaw.com

53 Siddartha Rao and Ellie Sanders, “What is the Metaverse and What Legal Issues Does It Raise?” (2021). Retrieved from https://www.romanolaw.com

54 Siddartha Rao and Ellie Sanders , “What is the Metaverse and What Legal Issues Does It Raise? “ (2021). Retrieved from https://www.romanolaw.com

55 Siddartha Rao and Ellie Sanders “What is the Metaverse and What Legal Issues Does It Raise?(2021). Retrieved from https://www.romanolaw.com

56 Srivathsan Karanai Margan, Insurance and the Metaverse . Retrieved from https://contingencies.org/insurance-and- Siddartha Rao and Ellie Sanders, “What is the Metaverse and What Legal Issues Does It Raise? “(2021). Retrieved from https://www.romanolaw.com

Siddartha Rao and Ellie Sanders, “What is the Metaverse and What Legal Issues Does It Raise?” (2021). Retrieved from https://www.romanolaw.com

Siddartha Rao and Ellie Sanders , “What is the Metaverse and What Legal Issues Does It Raise? “ (2021). Retrieved from https://www.romanolaw.com

Siddartha Rao and Ellie Sanders “What is the Metaverse and What Legal Issues Does It Raise?(2021). Retrieved from https://www.romanolaw.comthe-metaverse/

57 Ken Crutchfield, The Metaverse and The Practice of Law (2022)

58 Brightflag COO Alex Kelly , “The Critical Role of Lawyers in the Metaverse “ (2022). https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/resources/legal-technology/brightflag-coo-alex-kelly-discusses-the-critical-role-of-lawyers-in-themetaverse/367102

59 Brightflag COO Alex Kelly , “The Critical Role of Lawyers in the Metaverse” (2022). https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/resources/legal-technology/brightflag-coo-alex-kelly-discusses-the-critical-role-of-lawyers-in-themetaverse/367102

60 Brightflag COO Alex Kelly, “The Critical Role of Lawyers in the Metaverse.” (2022). https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/resources/legal-technology/brightflag-coo-alex-kelly-discusses-the-critical-role-of-lawyers-in-themetaverse/367102.

61Brightflag COO Alex Kelly, “The Critical Role of Lawyers in the Metaverse” (2022). https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/resources/legal-technology/brightflag-coo-alex-kelly-discusses-the-critical-role-of-lawyers-in-themetaverse/367102

62 Brightflag COO Alex Kelly , “The Critical Role of Lawyers in the Metaverse” (2022). https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/resources/legal-technology/brightflag-coo-alex-kelly-discusses-the-critical-role-of-lawyers-in-themetaverse/367102.

63 Brightflag COO Alex Kelly, “The Critical Role of Lawyers in the Metaverse” (2022) https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/resources/legal-technology/brightflag-coo-alex-kelly-discusses-the-critical-role-of-lawyers-in-themetaverse/367102

64 Joseph Raczynski , “Lawyers & the Metaverse”. (2022). Published in Thomson Reuters Asian Legal Business

65 Brightflag COO Alex Kelly , “The Critical Role of Lawyers in the Metaverse” (2022) .https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/resources/legal-technology/brightflag-coo-alex-kelly-discusses-the-critical-role-of-lawyers-in-themetaverse/367102

66Jonathan Goldsmith, “Lawyers must boldly go into the Metaverse.” Retrieved from https://www.lawgazette.com.uk/commentary-and-opinion/lawyers-must-boldly-go-into-the-metaverse/5111404.article

67 Alex Siryi , “A Role and Place for Lawyers in a Metaverse Explained” (2022). https://catware.io/blog/a-role-and-place-for-lawyers-in-a-metaverse-explained/

68 Brightflag COO Alex Kelly, “The Critical Role of Lawyers in the Metaverse”. https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/resources/legal-technology/brightflag-coo-alex-kelly-discusses-the-critical-role-of-lawyers-in-themetaverse/367102

69 Joseph Raczynski , “Lawyers & the Metaverse”. (2022). Published in Thomson Reuters Asian Legal Business

70 Looking into the Future of a Legal Metaverse. (2021)

71 Stephaine Iragbeson Omosun, The Metaverse and Some Legal Implications in Nigeria (2022). Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com

72 Stephaine Iragbeson Omosun, The Metaverse and Some Legal Implications in Nigeria (2022). Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com

73 Stephaine Iragbeson Omosun, “The Metaverse and Some Legal Implications in Nigeria (2022). Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com

74 Stephaine Iragbeson Omosun, The Metaverse and Some Legal Implications in Nigeria (2022. https://www.linkedin.com

75 “What is the Metaverse? Coming to Terms with Its Legal Implications (2022). Retrieved from https://thelawyer.ng/what-is-the-metaverse-coming-to-terms-with-its-legal-implications/

76 Omoniyi Edoigiawerie, ESQ, “Doing Business in the Metaverse: Legal Risks and Opportunities” (2022)

77 The Future of the Professions by Susskind and Susskind. Destefano (n2) pt, Ch1; margo(n1) 83.


Photo Credit: CNET


About Author

Ani Freedolyn is a 400-level law student at the Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. She loves to write about contemporary issues confronting her society and the legal profession with a view to proffering solutions to them. She believes that writing is a weapon one can use to change the world and make it a better place to live.