Order 26 FCT (Civil Procedure) Rules 2025

Order 26 of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2025 is about Interpleader. It contains the following rules:

  1. Relief by way of Interpleader may be granted where the
    person seeking relief (the applicant) is under liability for
    any debt, money, goods, or chattels, for or on which he is, or
    expects to be sued by two or more parties (the claimants)
    making adverse claims. But where the applicant is a sheriff
    or other officer charged with the execution of process by or
    under the authority of the High Court, the provisions of
    Section 34 of the Sheriffs and Civil process Act and the rules
    made under it shall apply.
  2. The applicant must satisfy the judge by affidavit or
    otherwise that he:
    (a) Claims no interest in the subject matter in dispute other
    than for charges or costs;
    (b) Does not collude with any of the claimants; and
    (c) Is willing to pay or transfer the subject matter into Court
    or to dispose of it as the judge may direct.
  1. The applicant shall not be disentitled to relief by reason
    only that the titles of the claimants have no common origin,
    but are adverse to and independent of one another.
  2. Where the applicant is a defendant, application for relief
    may be made at any time after service of the originating
    process.
  3. The applicant may take out a summons calling on the
    claimants to appear and state the nature and particulars of
    their claims and to maintain or relinquish them.
  1. If the application is made by a defendant in an action the
    Court may stay all further proceedings in the action.
  2. If the claimants appear in pursuance of the summons, the
    Court may order either that any claimant be made a
    defendant in any action already commenced in respect of
    the subject matter in dispute in lieu of, or in addition to the
    applicant or that an issue between the claimants be stated
    and tried, and in the latter case may direct which of the
    applicants is to be claimant or defendant.
  3. Where the question is a question of law and the facts are not
    in dispute, the Court may either decide the questions
    without directing the trial of an issue or order that a special
    case be stated for the opinion of the Court.
  1. If a claimant, having been duly served with a summons
    calling on him to appear and maintain or relinquish his
    claim, does not appear in pursuance of the summons or
    having appeared, neglects or refuses to comply with any
    order made after his appearance, the Court may make an
    order declaring him and all persons claiming under him,
    for ever barred against the applicant and persons claiming
    under him but the order shall not affect the rights of the
    claimants as between themselves.
  1. The Court may, in or for the purposes of any interpleader
    proceedings, make all such orders as to costs and all
    other matters as may be just.
See also  Section 84 Nigerian Arbitration and Mediation Act 2023
[/membership]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *