Lemna Nigeria Limited & Ors V. La’iyoba Nigeria Limited (2016)

LawGlobal-Hub Lead Judgment Report – COURT OF APPEAL

PAUL OBI ELECHI, J.C.A. (Delivering the Leading Judgment)

This is an appeal against the interlocutory decision (Ruling) of the High Court of Cross River State, Calabar Division delivered by Honourable Justice F. Nnang Isoni on the 1/4/2014 dismissing the Appellants Notice of preliminary objection challenging the Writ of Summons on the grounds of non-Certification and improper service contrary to Order 8 Rule 2(3) and Order 12 Rule 2 of the High Court of Cross River State (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2008.

The brief facts of this case is that the Respondent instituted this suit via a writ of summons dated and filed on the 23rd January 2014 seeking to enforce the terms of three equipment lease agreement between it and the Appellants. The said writ was duly served on the 1st Appellant. On the 27th day of January 2014, the Appellants filed a joint memorandum of appearance and followed it up on the 20th February 2014, by filing a Notice of Preliminary Objection challenging the jurisdiction of the Lower Court to entertain the suit on two grounds to wit:

(1) Whether failure to serve the 2nd and 3rd Defendants as required by the Rules of Court has not robbed

1

the Court of the jurisdiction to hear this suit.

(2) Whether non-compliance with the mandatory provisions of Order 8 Rule 3 and Order 12 of the High Court of Cross River State (Civil Procedure) Rules 2008 is not fatal to this case?

The Respondent filed a Written Address in opposition to the Appellants’ Preliminary Objection on the 24th February 2014.

Both processes were adopted and relied upon by parties. On the 1st April 2014, the learned trial Judge delivered a considered Ruling dismissing both grounds of Preliminary Objection.

Dissatisfied with the said Ruling, the Appellants appealed on two grounds.

From the two grounds of appeal, the Appellant distilled one issue for determination viz:

(1) Whether in the light of the decision of this Court, it unreported Judgment in Appeal No. CA/C/174/2009: ONUN OTU ECHU IGRIGA V. ELDER EFFIONG OKON BASSEY, the Learned trial Judge was right in over ruling the Preliminary Objection of the Appellants?

To argue this issue, Learned Appellants’ Counsel stated that their contention in the Preliminary Objection was that the Respondent did not comply with the provisions of Order 8 Rule 2(3)

2

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *