Peter Onyeachonam Obanye V. Union Bank Of Nigeria Plc (2018)

LAWGLOBAL HUB Lead Judgment Report

CHIMA CENTUS NWEZE, J.S.C.

The appellant was an employee of the respondent. The respondent, by a letter of November 28, 2003, although back-dated to October 30, 2003, terminated the said employment. Sequel to the said letter, the respondent credited his account with the required one month’s salary in lieu of Notice on December 3, 2003. However, only five days later, the respondent reversed the payment. Having failed in all his attempts to persuade the respondent to reverse the said termination of his employment, the appellant repaired to the Anambra State High Court, Onitsha Judicial Division.

Thereat, he caused a Writ of Summons to be issued and served on the respondent. He claimed the following reliefs:

(a) A Declaration that the termination of the plaintiffs employment by the defendant is illegal, null and void and of no effect, the defendant having failed to comply with the staff condition of service by paying the plaintiff one month (sic) salary in lieu of service (sic, Notice);

(b) An Order for the defendant to pay the plaintiff all his salaries from December, 2003 and from

1

2004 to 2008, which is the sum of N17,057,967.00 (Seventeen Million, Fifty-Seven Thousand, Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven Naira) and such other entitlements due to the plaintiff until judgment is delivered;

(c) An order that the plaintiff is entitled to 6263 unit shares of UBESOT as a staff of the defendant;

(d) N100,000,000 (One Hundred Million Naira) general damages for the plaintiffs unlawful dismissal.

Upon the eventual joinder of issues in the settled pleadings, the matter went to trial. The appellant, (as plaintiff) testified as the sole witness. He tendered nineteen exhibits, Exhibits P1-P19. On her part, the respondent, (as defendant), equally called only one witness who testified and tendered one exhibit, Exhibit D1. The High Court (hereinafter, simply, referred to as “the trial Court”) dismissed the plaintiff’s case, prompting the appellant’s appeal to the Court of Appeal, Enugu Division, (hereinafter simply referred to as “the lower Court”).

The lower Court allowed the appeal in part, holding that “all that the appellant is entitled to is one-month (sic) salary in lieu of Notice and any other entitlements

2

legitimately due to him at the time of termination of his employment and nothing more.” Aggrieved, the appellant further appealed to this Court entreating it to determine the two issues he set out. However, at the hearing, he withdrew the second issue. Thus, the only extant issue for the determination of this appeal is the one framed thus:

Whether the appellant is not entitled to damages, the Court of Appeal having found that the employment of the appellant was wrongly terminated as the one month’s salary in lieu of Notice was not paid, the respondent having breached the terms of the Contract of Employment binding the two parties